<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version='2.0' xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'><channel>
<atom:link href='http://www.accordancebible.com/common/rss2/?&amp;channel=blog_comments&amp;article_id=3334340' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
<title>Accordance Bible Software Blog Comments</title>
<link>http://www.accordancebible.com/common/rss2/?&amp;channel=blog_comments&amp;article_id=3334340</link>
<description>Syndicated BLOG Comments from Accordance Bible Software.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Accordance Bible Software</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:23:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<webMaster>support@accordancebible.com (Accordance Bible Software)</webMaster><item><title>Brent Lawrence</title><link>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</link><description><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I <span style="text-decoration: underline;">think</span> I know the company to which you are referring, but in the spirit of your efforts not to slam the competition, I will not "guess." That having been said, I believe they still make the Windows version of the software, which I used to use many years ago before the company changed hands a couple of times and before I "made the switch." There is no way their software is competitive on a Mac, and they ceased being a major competitor in Windows a long time ago. They actually took a great Windows product years ago and made it virtually un-useable. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Enough about them. I made the switch to Accordance a number of years ago and it is the best Bible software on any platform. In fact, it was Accordance that kept me on a Mac when briefly I thought I might go back to Windows. Keep up the excellent work and may God bless your work.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:48:47 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</guid><dc:creator>Brent Lawrence</dc:creator></item><item><title>David Lang</title><link>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Timmy, I was afraid some might think I was referring to Logos in this post, but I'm not. This is another program that released a Mac version several years ago. My point here, and the reason I'm not naming the product, is not to slam the competition so much as to show that Accordance is the better choice. :-)</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:52:58 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</guid><dc:creator>David Lang</dc:creator></item><item><title>Timmy V.</title><link>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I know you're not supposed to, but it's really OK. &nbsp;You can mention their name (Logos). :)</p>
<p>I'm still quite happy with Accordance as my Bible software and not sure why people want Logos on the Mac unless they've already invested a lot of money in it on Windows. &nbsp;It's sort of like buying a DSLR camera. &nbsp;The body, while almost always the cheapest compononent, is often the most important choice, because it then dictates what lens's you get to use. &nbsp;Once you're locked in. &nbsp;You're locked in.<span style="white-space: pre;"> </span></p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:39:23 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</guid><dc:creator>Timmy V.</dc:creator></item><item><title>Lester Bagley</title><link>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</link><description><![CDATA[<p>Sadly this is a fairly common practice among software developers and has caused me to drop numerous programs over the years. I just won\'t support a developer that charges for an \"upgrade\" that fixes bugs!</p>
<p>That said, I\'m still updating my Accordance with each new \"paid\" upgrade. Perhaps that says something for the non-Accordance users out there.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:39:15 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.accordancebible.com/3334340</guid><dc:creator>Lester Bagley</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>