Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 3 votes

Pillar New Testament Commentary


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Helen Brown

Helen Brown

    Mithril

  • Admin
  • 8,112 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:heart in Israel
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 04 January 2011 - 12:18 PM

If you have used this commentary in print and/or in Accordance, please review it for others' benefit, and give the module an overall rating in the top right corner by Rate Topic.
Helen Brown
OakTree Software

#2 jfidel

jfidel

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 05 January 2011 - 11:45 AM

Reviewing an entire commentary series is somewhat challenging given that there are highs and lows in any series. The Pillar NT Commentaries are more even than most series due to the editorial efforts of D. A. Carson. There are some volumes that are probably my first choice such as John by D. A. Carson and the volumes on James and Ephesians.

As a NT set I would rate this as my second favorite, with the New International Commentary set being my favorite. The set is still be written, so plan to pay for future updates.

Evaluations of commentaries are subjective and based upon one’s skills with original languages and overall theology. I tend more toward evangelical and practical in my tastes.

I did do some mathematical analysis of the ratings of various commentary sets at www.bestcommentaries.com and have provided my summary below. The participants in this polling include:
· John Glynn
· D. A. Carson
· Tremper Longman, III
· Jim Rosscup
· Derek Thomas
· John Piper (Desiring God Ministries)
· R. C. Sproul (Keith Mathison)
· Denver Seminary Journal

And others…. Care should be taken in evaluating raw data such as this, and it is best to not read too much into this summary. It is somewhat interesting for those in the process of evaluating the purchase of commentary sets. Each person should evaluate each set further before purchasing. The clear winner is the New International Commentary set for both the NT and OT. I do concur with this.

I can post my excel files for anyone interested.

Bestcommentaries.com
Overall Series Rankings
As of 1/1/11

Series Rank Comments

OLD TESTAMENT
New International Commentary 1
Baker Exegetical Commentary 2 Only 3 volumes
Tyndale Commentary 3
NIV Application Commentary 4
New American Commentary 5
Word Bible Commentary 6
Anchor Bible Commentary 7
Hermeneia 8
Exegetical Bible Commentary 9


NEW TESTAMENT
New International Commentary 1
Pillar NT Commentary 2
Word Bible Commentary 3
Baker Exegetical Commentary 4
NIV Application Commentary 5
New American Commentary 6
Tyndale Commentary 7
International Critical Commentary 8
Anchor Bible Commentary 9

Edited by jfidel, 08 January 2011 - 09:18 AM.


#3 Fr. Rich

Fr. Rich

    Gold

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Indiana
  • Interests:My grandchildren
    Being an effective parish priest at Christ the King Episcopal
    Church in Huntington< Indiana
    Fly fishing
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 06 January 2011 - 11:50 AM

"Hermenutica 8" Do you mean Hermeneia?
Rich Miller
Priest in Charge
Christ the King Episcopal Church
Huntington, Indiana

Labor mediator and arbitrator

#4 jfidel

jfidel

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 06 January 2011 - 11:55 AM

Yes! Thank you for catching that.

#5 Bob Kuo

Bob Kuo

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Champaign-Urbana, IL
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 17 January 2011 - 11:12 AM

I have used the volume on John (by D.A. Carson) extensively in personal study, the volume on Colossians and Philemon (by Douglas Moo) in my Greek Exegesis class, the volume on Hebrews (by Peter O'Brien) while leading a church Bible study, and the volumes on James and the letters of John a bit less. The PNTC is not as technical as Hermenia, WBC, or the GNTC, but more so than Tyndale. I like this series because it spends less time on technical issues (like textual variants) and more time on exegesis. Also, the authors of each volume take the text at face value - they don't offer hypothetical reconstructions of the previous form of the text to explain away some difficulty. The series engages with some recent discussion and delineates the pros and cons of common interpretations on difficult passages or theologically important passages. Not as readable as Tyndale or other commentary series aimed at exposition, PNTC is a bit larger than those and probably my first choice when I run into a question in the text. I highly recommend the volumes on John and Hebrews.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users