Jump to content

Newbie help with grammatical tags and @ sign


Meg

Recommended Posts

I'm still learning how to do this, so I hope I'm posting in the right place. Doing a Hebrew search for ish + 3rd. fem. sing. suffix, "her man".

 

Under the Search menu I choose Enter Lexical Form and choose "ish"

Under the Search menu I choose Enter Tag --> Suffix, and chose 3rd person, fem, sing

 

Accordance automatically inserts the @ sign between the two elements.

 

I click the search button and get this message: ' There are no verses in the current range of the "BHS-W4 text, which fit the current search entry.'

 

I click OK, and after a lot of trial and error, I remove the @ and leave a SPACE between the 2 elements and the search finds what I am looking for -- 39 hits.

 

I've been reading the manuals and watching the videos until I am crosseyed and everything says I need the @ symbol here. What am I doing wrong? How do I know when to remove the @ sign?

 

Thanks,

Meg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that you don't need the @. The @ is used for attributes of the same element. Here you have two separate elements: The noun and the possesive pronoun.

I still wonder why Accordance adds the @ when you insert the suffix tag. Maybe someone else can clarify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually when people enter a word followed by a tag they do want them to apply to the same item, this is why Accordance adds the @. David is correct that you just need to delete it in the cases where you are effectively looking for a phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alternatively, just type a space before choosing to enter the SUFFIX, to confirm that you want it as a phrase and not a requirement of your other word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually when people enter a word followed by a tag they do want them to apply to the same item, this is why Accordance adds the @.

 

Isn't it always false when it comes to the suffix? I mean if the suffix is tagged as a separate morpheme then how can the @ ever be relevant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not relevant to a suffix after a lemma or root, but it can be added after an inflected form, or a COUNT or HITS command. The @ can link any of these together to define a single word, even multiple terms (though these are often done more clearly in the Construct window).

 

Of course, Accordance could be programmed NOT to put the @ when adding [sUFFIX] after a lemma or root, but no-one has complained about it, and the developers have a very long honey-do list as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Found this thread of last year helpful but also need to find nouns without pronominal suffixes. There is a NOT indicated at the bottom of the SUFFUX Tag dialog box. I thought that I would be able to select the NOT as a way to exclude any suffixes associated with the noun. But I find I cannot select this NOT. I suspect I'm missing something simple. Thanks for you help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you will find that the NOT becomes available when you select one of the options in the suffix dropdowns.

 

To get no pronom suffixes at all, I think you will have to shift click each one to select all the options, and then NOT the entire selection on that line.

 

A little tiresome, but it should work.

 

Can anyone else think of a better way of doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To find nouns not followed by any suffix you would either use a string of commands and tags in the Search tab:

[NOUN] [sUFFIX}

which is fairly easy to construct using the drop down menus

 

or set it up in the Construct tab:

 

Noun_not_suffix.png

 

which is way more elegant.

 

Longtime users need to remember that until 9 the Construct always assumed adjacent words, but it no longer does, so we do need to add the WITHIN connecting item.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...