Jump to content

BDB & ITS INSTANT DETAILS, EZ IS NOT = EX


Enoch

Recommended Posts

Here is a problematic BDB entry or its Instant Details is problematic:

 

"[p. 1065]

"8476 † I. ‏תחש‎ n.m. taḫaš, a kind of leather or skin, and perh. the animal yielding it (prob. the dugong, cf. Ar. تخس dolphin, Thes:1500 Di-Ry:Ex 25:5 Post:Hast. DB BADGER; As. taḫšu (Dl: Baer Ezech. xvi), for which Dl:Proi. 77 ff.; HWB 705 conj. meaning sheep(skin); Bondi:Egyptiaca 1 ff. cp. Egypt. ṯḥš, leather; v. summary of views M’Lean-Shiply:Ency. Bib. BADGERS’ SKINS);—abs. ‏ת׳‎: Nu 4:6 +, ‏תחש‎ v:8 +; pl. ‏תחשים‎ Ex 25:5 + ;—leather used for (woman’s) sandals [b]Ez 16:10[/b]; elsewhere for cover of tabernacle Nu 4:25, ‏עור ת׳‎: v:6, v:8, v:10, v:11, v:12, v:14, ‏תחשים‎(‏ה‎)‏ערת ‎ Ex 25:5, 26:14, 35:7, 35:23, 36:19, 39:34 (all P)." [emphasis mine]

 

When one puts the cursor on "Ez 16:10," one gets Ex 16:10. Ezekiel is not Exodus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe typos and errors can/should be reported directly by email to Helen at accordancebible dot com.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...