hefin jones Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 This one might be technically really really difficult - and quite possibly the market for fixing it up just too small, but in using User Notes with the Pseudepigrapha I'm finding repeatedly mismatches between the Charlesworth and Charles english texts, where a note written on say Jubilees 5.12 in one will appear as if it is on Jubilees 5.11 on the other. I've generally not tried writing notes on the greek where it exists - I know that it's difficult to get all these disparate texts to line up nicely.Also this might just be incompetence on my part - or it might be a current limitation of accordance but I haven't yet worked out if there's a way of making links to canonical biblical texts in user notes on the pseudepigrapha and vice versa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hefin jones Posted November 13, 2014 Author Share Posted November 13, 2014 Just wondering whether there's a problem with the 'alignment' of Charles and Charlesworth in general? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 If you see alignment problems between the different versions of the Pseudepigrapha, please report them to Corrections. I doubt that anyone has taken too many notes yet on these modules. Are you using version 11 new format notes, or the older format? I believe that scripture links should work in both formats. Charlesworth does have his own cross-reference modules included in the package. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now