Jump to content

Search Error?


William Varner

Recommended Posts

I searched for all Future Participles in the NT and 13 were returned. One, however, is a present participle (katakrinwn in Romans 8:34). Any explanation?

 

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you use Amplify > Language > Parsing, you'll see that future is an alternative parsing for the form. I was going to check Perseus, but the site seems unresponsive at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at the parsing window for Romans 8:34, you'll see that that participle has a secondary parsing in which it is a future participle. It is accounting for that secondary parsing, not just the parsing that shows up in the instant details box.

 

HTH,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I now see that it has a double parsing, depending on where the accent was originally placed - ultima or penult.

Only the present participle parsing, however, showed up in the instant details window.

 

Thanks for the quick replies.

 

 

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...