Λύχνις Δαν Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Hi ya, If I do a * [RANGE Gen 1:1-3] it does not highlight all the words whereas including <AND> will do so. In addition it records no hits and thus Analysis panes and such contain no information. thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 For the former, sans , you are actually performing just the simple RANGE search, which is why there are no hits marked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve King Posted November 8, 2014 Share Posted November 8, 2014 Interestingly enough when I try * [Range gen 1:1-3] it does highlight all the words - same as including the <AND>. Found out that the difference was that I had a space in front of the *. Should that really make a difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted November 9, 2014 Author Share Posted November 9, 2014 @Joel : hmmmm... that's strikes me as a little odd - <AND> became optional with [RANGE x] at some point in 10.x - cannot remember when. I would have expected therefore that constructions where it was not used the queries would otherwise act in the same manner. As [RANGE x] does the same thing as * [RANGE x] it also seems redundant. Of course, it doesn't practically speaking matter much - I just happened to notice due to the surprising outcome. Perhaps I misunderstand the exact nature of the optional <AND> with [RANGE x]. @Steve : that's very interesting and looks inconsistent also. I would not expect leading whitespace to be significant unless it was quoted. tx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Interestingly enough when I try * [Range gen 1:1-3] it does highlight all the words - same as including the <AND>. Found out that the difference was that I had a space in front of the *. Should that really make a difference? That’s very interesting Steve1! Seems wierd, but definitely reproducible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now