tebel Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 When amplifying from text to tool using HMT-W4 and the Dictionary of Classical Hebrew as my default lexicon, I find that the references are not always highlighted though the dictionary may have an exact reference to the text I am amplifying. rari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 Please give a specific example or post a screenshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebel Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 The behaviour is not consistent. Sometimes the reference is highlighted, but not at other times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 The behaviour is not consistent. Sometimes the reference is highlighted, but not at other times. I found the issue. We are about to release an update, and will correct this as well. Thanks for the report. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebel Posted January 14, 2013 Author Share Posted January 14, 2013 Many thanks! rari Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebel Posted October 31, 2013 Author Share Posted October 31, 2013 Though I reported this issue at the start of the year it has not yet been fully resolved. The problem still occurs unpredictably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 The basic issue with DCH is that sections within an entry are treated as separate articles and so the references don't get highlighted. This may not be possible or easy to correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 I apologize for the long delay in getting a release out and (hopefully) addressing this. We've been adding the page numbers back into the e-text and that got delayed. Along with that I see how to fix this, but because of the sheer size of the resource it will require some work to get it to build properly and treat all the articles as individual entities (which is what is necessary to get the search hits to show as expected). Thanks for your patience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now