Douglas Fyfe Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) this seems like a pretty simple search: מות <WITHIN 1 words> מות ie, trying one way of showing intensification but it's giving me hits where they are within the same verse, not next to each other. see screen shot attached for three consecutive false hits. is this a bug or am i searching wrongly? cheers mwt false hits.tiff Edited May 9, 2014 by Douglas Fyfe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Thigpen Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) Adding <followed by> should do the trick. מות <within 1 words> <followed by> מות Mike Edited May 9, 2014 by Mike Thigpen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 Hey ya, <WITHIN 1-1 WORDS> also works yielding 114 hits. <WITHIN 1 WORDS> and <FOLLOWED BY> on their own each produce 300 hits with some hits which are not adjacent. For <FOLLOWED BY> this seems correct, but for WITHIN 1 it doesn't. And what the how the WITHIN 1 and FOLLOWED BY return on their own I don't follow why together they give the correct answer. So is this a bug in the <WITHIN 1 words> implementation ? Or am I missing something ? In case it matters my tests are on 10.4.2.1 on Mac. Thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 There has always been an issue using the simple search tab to find multiple occurrences of the same word, and I suspect that is the issue here. We are refining this for a future rev. In the meantime, the Construct tab usually provides much more accurate results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 Thx Helen, I think I've been over some of this ground before but I didn't make the connection. ThxD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Fyfe Posted May 10, 2014 Author Share Posted May 10, 2014 Thanks. I only tried this search after reading that the latest update meant using <and> for the same word would now work. But I understand for this to trickle through the other commands (such as <within>)might take some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now