ryangeer Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 When looking up the entry for natsal (nun, tsade, lamed) - I noticed that the inf. construct appears to have a gimmel as the first root consonant. Is this correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Lang Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Ryan, that gimel should indeed be a nun. Good catch. Now, I'm no Hebrew expert, but I was able to confirm your suspicion that the gimel was incorrect using Accordance. Any guesses as to how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryangeer Posted September 1, 2009 Author Share Posted September 1, 2009 A search for ntsl in the bhs - limited to inf. cons. form shows the word in its correct spelling... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.