Abram K-J Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 This may be a programming nightmare, but I thought I'd ask anyway--I click on a hyperlink to NICOT (mentioned in the Beale-Carson commentary). It tells me, "This hyperlink cannot be shown because the module 'NICOT' is not installed." This is technically true, as I don't own all of NICOT (hence, "the module," as such). However, I do own the Isaiah volume, the specific volume referenced in this part of the Beale-Carson commentary. Maybe this kind of thing is part of why Accordance tends to not favor breaking up collections into individual volumes (because of requests/posts like this), but are owners of individual volumes just not going to be able to utilize hyperlinks like this one? I haven't seen enough other instances to know whether or not this is consistent behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted December 11, 2013 Share Posted December 11, 2013 We actually have the underlying work in place to define whether a module is a apart of a larger group (NICOT-Isaiah > NICOT) so that the links work, but I'm not sure how much we've tested it. It's all recent stuff. So, we should be able to support this in the future. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abram K-J Posted December 11, 2013 Author Share Posted December 11, 2013 Excellent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now