mikes Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 I think I've found a module that lacks bibliographical information in ACCS. Can anyone else confirm? Is there a list of modules not yet covered that I've been unable to find? Thanks, Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 Yes, you are correct, but I think this will be an extremely difficult module to cite correctly. We will certainly be updating the files from time to time, but i think almost all our current modules are covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted November 16, 2009 Share Posted November 16, 2009 I think I've found a module that lacks bibliographical information in ACCS. Can anyone else confirm? Is there a list of modules not yet covered that I've been unable to find? Thanks, Mike Hi Mike, Sorry that ACCS isn't working; it slipped through our radar! We'll see what we can do. As of now there isn't a list. The only two (now three) modules that I know of that aren't compatible with this feature are: NIBC (we're working on it currently), and DSS Studies. The latter is a very complicated resource to be able to cite correctly (much more so than ACCS). In the least we will offer an approximate solution, but will require the user to check against their style guide of choice to verify accuracy. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikes Posted November 16, 2009 Author Share Posted November 16, 2009 HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.