It appears the verb shlk in Hebrew is missing an English gloss definition, or is this intentional? I've attached a screenshot:[attachment=112:attachment]
Hebrew word missing English gloss?
Started by
Robb Brunansky
, Nov 27 2006 06:36 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Robb Brunansky
-
- Active Members
-
- 686 posts
Platinum
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glendale, AZ
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 27 November 2006 - 06:36 PM
Soli Deo Gloria,
Robb Brunansky
Robb Brunansky
#2
Helen Brown
-
- Admin
-
- 6,911 posts
Mithril
- Gender:Female
- Location:heart in Israel
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 27 November 2006 - 10:03 PM
Yes you may now see some missing glosses since we no longer fill in glosses when the lemmas do not exactly match. We will correct this in the future, and fill in the missing ones.
However, in this case the gloss is showing up for us, so you may need a newer BHS-W4 or a newer hebrew words which is in the 7.1 installer (should be dated 9/18/06).
However, in this case the gloss is showing up for us, so you may need a newer BHS-W4 or a newer hebrew words which is in the 7.1 installer (should be dated 9/18/06).
Helen Brown
OakTree Software
OakTree Software
#3
Robb Brunansky
-
- Active Members
-
- 686 posts
Platinum
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glendale, AZ
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 07 December 2006 - 09:10 AM
After downloading the latest 7.1 installer last night, this gloss shows up.
Soli Deo Gloria,
Robb Brunansky
Robb Brunansky
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
