Jump to content


Photo

within 1 word giving me within a verse

within

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Douglas Fyfe

Douglas Fyfe

    Silver

  • Accordance
  • 103 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Jesus, Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, German, Cantonese, the mighty Essendon Bombers
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 07:07 AM

this seems like a pretty simple search:

מות <WITHIN 1 words> מות

ie, trying one way of showing intensification

but it's giving me hits where they are within the same verse, not next to each other.

see screen shot attached for three consecutive false hits.

is this a bug or am i searching wrongly?

cheers

Attached Files


Edited by Douglas Fyfe, 09 May 2014 - 07:36 AM.

iPhone 5s - iOS 7 || Windows 8.1 - Samsung ATIV ultrabook i5 - 1.80GHz || MacBookPro - OSX 10.6.8

#2 Mike Thigpen

Mike Thigpen

    Bronze

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Louisville, KY
  • Interests:Old Testament, Hebrew, ANE History, etc.
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 08:30 AM

Adding <followed by> should do the trick.  

 

מות <within 1 words> <followed by> מות  

 

Mike


Edited by Mike Thigpen, 09 May 2014 - 08:30 AM.


#3 Daniel Semler

Daniel Semler

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 09:11 AM

Hey ya,

 

<WITHIN 1-1 WORDS> also works yielding 114 hits.

 

<WITHIN 1 WORDS> and <FOLLOWED BY> on their own each produce 300 hits with some hits which are not adjacent. For <FOLLOWED BY> this seems correct, but for WITHIN 1 it doesn't. And what the how the WITHIN 1 and FOLLOWED BY return on their own I don't follow why together they give the correct answer.

 

So is this a bug in the <WITHIN 1 words> implementation ? Or am I missing something ?

 

In case it matters my tests are on 10.4.2.1 on Mac.

 

Thx

D


Accordance Configurations :
 
Mac : 2009 27" iMac                 Windows : HP 4540s laptop
      Intel Core Duo                          Intel i5 Ivy Bridge
      12GB RAM                                8GB RAM
      Accordance 10.4.3.2                     Accordance 10.4.3.2 and Aleph 10.4.3.2
      OSX 10.9 (Mavericks)                    Win 7 Professional x64 SP1

#4 Helen Brown

Helen Brown

    Mithril

  • Admin
  • 8,246 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:heart in Israel
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 10:15 AM

There has always been an issue using the simple search tab to find multiple occurrences of the same word, and I suspect that is the issue here. We are refining this for a future rev. In the meantime, the Construct tab usually provides much more accurate results.


Helen Brown
OakTree Software

#5 Daniel Semler

Daniel Semler

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,369 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 11:09 AM

Thx Helen, I think I've been over some of this ground before but I didn't make the connection.

 

Thx
D


Accordance Configurations :
 
Mac : 2009 27" iMac                 Windows : HP 4540s laptop
      Intel Core Duo                          Intel i5 Ivy Bridge
      12GB RAM                                8GB RAM
      Accordance 10.4.3.2                     Accordance 10.4.3.2 and Aleph 10.4.3.2
      OSX 10.9 (Mavericks)                    Win 7 Professional x64 SP1

#6 Douglas Fyfe

Douglas Fyfe

    Silver

  • Accordance
  • 103 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Jesus, Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, German, Cantonese, the mighty Essendon Bombers
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 09 May 2014 - 07:37 PM

Thanks. I only tried this search after reading that the latest update meant using <and> for the same word would now work.

But I understand for this to trickle through the other commands (such as <within>)might take some time.


iPhone 5s - iOS 7 || Windows 8.1 - Samsung ATIV ultrabook i5 - 1.80GHz || MacBookPro - OSX 10.6.8





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: within

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users