BHS-W4 with Sources Revealed
#1
Posted 12 December 2006 - 11:49 PM
It would also be nice to have a module that will offer the user at least two options (i.e. Friedman and Noth) with the possibility of displaying the text as a continuous narrative or in different colors.
Check: http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml
Any chance we might see it in the near future?
Assistant Professor of Hebrew Bible Boston, MA 02215-1401
Boston University School of Theology http://www.bu.edu/sth/faculty/staff/botta.html
Tel. 617-353-3063
Fax 617-353-3061
#2
Posted 13 December 2006 - 09:20 AM
I was thrilled to discover an online resource!
#3
Posted 13 December 2006 - 11:39 AM
#4
Posted 14 December 2006 - 06:15 AM
The timeline is, to me, the most interesting module in Accordance, for it has two differing sets of dates, eh: "conservative" and "critical." Even those are ballpark dates for the two camps - there are widely differing opinions, eh.
Perhaps I might offer the following: in keeping with the nature of Accordance to allow the user to do powerful things with the text, instead of offering a single pre-formulated ordering of the Biblical text, what would it be like if there was a way for the user to maniupulate the ordering of the text? I suspect it wouldn't be too terribly difficult to manage. It is possible to do even now in the search window, but the string would be so incredibly long... Perhaps the module could be called "Scissors". But then, that sounds more like OS X, than Accordance
I suppose this is just a poor exegete dreaming, but if I was designing an exegetes haxie for Accordance, it would re-organize all the modules according to the method they are appropriate for...
Edited by autopistis, 14 December 2006 - 06:17 AM.
at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
South Hamilton, MA, USA
simplechristians.blogspot.com
#5
Posted 14 December 2006 - 09:44 AM
I remember professor Kirkpatrick at McGill telling us to photocopy the text and either get scissors or some highlighters.
The timeline is, to me, the most interesting module in Accordance, for it has two differing sets of dates, eh: "conservative" and "critical." Even those are ballpark dates for the two camps - there are widely differing opinions, eh.
Perhaps I might offer the following: in keeping with the nature of Accordance to allow the user to do powerful things with the text, instead of offering a single pre-formulated ordering of the Biblical text, what would it be like if there was a way for the user to maniupulate the ordering of the text? I suspect it wouldn't be too terribly difficult to manage. It is possible to do even now in the search window, but the string would be so incredibly long... Perhaps the module could be called "Scissors". But then, that sounds more like OS X, than Accordance![]()
I suppose this is just a poor exegete dreaming, but if I was designing an exegetes haxie for Accordance, it would re-organize all the modules according to the method they are appropriate for...
Alternate Sorting of Search Results
I'll second that. It would be great to be able to do a study viewing material by alternate sorts, especially by date. Perhaps a mechanism to perform many separate searches, chained together, to present a chronological search result.
#6
Posted 14 December 2006 - 12:05 PM
I remember professor Kirkpatrick at McGill telling us to photocopy the text and either get scissors or some highlighters.
The timeline is, to me, the most interesting module in Accordance, for it has two differing sets of dates, eh: "conservative" and "critical." Even those are ballpark dates for the two camps - there are widely differing opinions, eh.
Perhaps I might offer the following: in keeping with the nature of Accordance to allow the user to do powerful things with the text, instead of offering a single pre-formulated ordering of the Biblical text, what would it be like if there was a way for the user to maniupulate the ordering of the text? I suspect it wouldn't be too terribly difficult to manage. It is possible to do even now in the search window, but the string would be so incredibly long... Perhaps the module could be called "Scissors". But then, that sounds more like OS X, than Accordance![]()
I suppose this is just a poor exegete dreaming, but if I was designing an exegetes haxie for Accordance, it would re-organize all the modules according to the method they are appropriate for...
Assistant Professor of Hebrew Bible Boston, MA 02215-1401
Boston University School of Theology http://www.bu.edu/sth/faculty/staff/botta.html
Tel. 617-353-3063
Fax 617-353-3061
#7
Posted 15 December 2006 - 06:10 AM
at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
South Hamilton, MA, USA
simplechristians.blogspot.com
#8
Posted 17 December 2006 - 08:32 PM
I dig it!
Assistant Professor of Hebrew Bible Boston, MA 02215-1401
Boston University School of Theology http://www.bu.edu/sth/faculty/staff/botta.html
Tel. 617-353-3063
Fax 617-353-3061
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











