I searched for all Future Participles in the NT and 13 were returned. One, however, is a present participle (katakrinwn in Romans 8:34). Any explanation?
Will
Search Error?
Started by
William Varner
, Feb 13 2007 11:13 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
William Varner
-
- Active Members
-
- 43 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santa Clarita, CA
- Interests:Greek exegesis, hermeneutics, patristics, Civil War, grandchildren
- Accordance Version:9.x
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:13 AM
#2
jpkang
-
- Active Members
-
- 577 posts
Platinum
- Gender:Male
- Location:Seattle, WA
- Interests:Comparative Semitics; ancient Hebrew semantics; Hebrew syntax; history and religion of ancient Israel; history of interpretation.
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:25 AM
If you use Amplify > Language > Parsing, you'll see that future is an alternative parsing for the form. I was going to check Perseus, but the site seems unresponsive at the moment.
J. P. Kang, Ph.D. (Bible)
#3
Robb Brunansky
-
- Active Members
-
- 686 posts
Platinum
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glendale, AZ
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:25 AM
If you look at the parsing window for Romans 8:34, you'll see that that participle has a secondary parsing in which it is a future participle. It is accounting for that secondary parsing, not just the parsing that shows up in the instant details box.
HTH,
HTH,
Soli Deo Gloria,
Robb Brunansky
Robb Brunansky
#4
William Varner
-
- Active Members
-
- 43 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santa Clarita, CA
- Interests:Greek exegesis, hermeneutics, patristics, Civil War, grandchildren
- Accordance Version:9.x
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:48 AM
Yes, I now see that it has a double parsing, depending on where the accent was originally placed - ultima or penult.
Only the present participle parsing, however, showed up in the instant details window.
Thanks for the quick replies.
Will
Only the present participle parsing, however, showed up in the instant details window.
Thanks for the quick replies.
Will
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
