Jump to content


Photo

ESV-Strongs


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Peter Bogert

Peter Bogert

    Member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
  • Accordance Version:8.x

Posted 28 June 2008 - 06:01 PM

I am finding that when I have the ESVS up I get far fewer words displaying their Hebrew/Greek definitions than I do with the NASB-Strongs module up.
Should I have something set in the Instant Details preference? The key highlighting box is greyed out despite my having what I thought were tagged English texts (NASB-S, ESV-S, KJV-S).

#2 Justin Burt

Justin Burt

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 167 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Indonesia
  • Interests:Chess, Backpacking, and Traveling.

Posted 28 June 2008 - 09:25 PM

Peter,

I am confused by your last two questions, the feature is obviously working for you because you were able to notice a difference between the ESVS and NAS95S. But as far as those two texts are concerned, the ESVS is not yet complete. The website says "Strong's numbers have been added to the New Testament, and partially to the Old Testament (to be completed in 2008)". I would guess that this is the difference you are seeing between the NAS95S and ESVS.

Edited by Justin Burt, 28 June 2008 - 09:36 PM.

Justin Burt

#3 Peter Bogert

Peter Bogert

    Member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
  • Accordance Version:8.x

Posted 29 June 2008 - 04:11 PM

Peter,

I am confused by your last two questions, the feature is obviously working for you because you were able to notice a difference between the ESVS and NAS95S. But as far as those two texts are concerned, the ESVS is not yet complete. The website says "Strong's numbers have been added to the New Testament, and partially to the Old Testament (to be completed in 2008)". I would guess that this is the difference you are seeing between the NAS95S and ESVS.


AHA! It was in Ruth that I was looking. The fact that the OT is not complete is the culprit.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users