White finally gives up
Posted 13 August 2008 - 09:22 PM
Posted 13 August 2008 - 11:18 PM
Edited by Robb Brunansky, 13 August 2008 - 11:18 PM.
Posted 14 August 2008 - 12:14 AM
Posted 01 September 2008 - 03:34 AM
Posted 01 September 2008 - 05:00 AM
Posted 01 September 2008 - 03:02 PM
The Mac Logos version is certainly not the full blown Windows version. But I will say that it is WAY faster than the Windows version. I don't know enough about the market to know whether it is much of a threat to Accordance.
Rev. Todd Peperkorn
Messiah Lutheran Church (LCMS)
Kenosha, WI 53140
Posted 02 September 2008 - 06:37 AM
I myself lust for a few things Logos offers that Accordance does not -Collegeville commentary! Buy it from Lit Press, not Logos, to save a lot of money- but in general their support for Catholics is far, far inferior to Accordance. And they charge twice as much for their Early Church Fathers set - for their price it had better have a plug directly into my brain.
Posted 03 September 2008 - 02:34 PM
But here's the thing: If the beta version is stripped down, then it's not a true beta. You don't beta test an incomplete product. What if the new features add bugs? That's what a beta test is for. I heard in a seminary class 2+ years ago from someone who said "wait for the mac logos, it should be out in a few months" and I launched into an accordance sales pitch, not the least of which was "guys, it's here right now and it works better than logos now..."
If they are showing a feature incomplete beta, they are still a LONG way from a proper release.
Posted 03 September 2008 - 03:55 PM
Posted 04 September 2008 - 01:09 AM
I want more modules for Accordance, but so does everybody else. We just all have our own list of modules we crave, which varies by denomination and interest area. I'd like the Papal Encyclicals, English and Latin, but, just as an example, I don't think ToddPeperkorn has much use for them as a Lutheran.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users