Jump to content


Photo

HALOT entry


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 ryangeer

ryangeer

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:9.x

Posted 01 September 2009 - 09:38 AM

When looking up the entry for natsal (nun, tsade, lamed) - I noticed that the inf. construct appears to have a gimmel as the first root consonant. Is this correct?

Attached Files



#2 David Lang

David Lang

    Platinum

  • Accordance
  • 754 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mount Dora, FL
  • Interests:Accordance development, writing, spending time with my wife and five kids
  • Accordance Version:9.x

Posted 01 September 2009 - 10:12 AM

Ryan, that gimel should indeed be a nun. Good catch.

Now, I'm no Hebrew expert, but I was able to confirm your suspicion that the gimel was incorrect using Accordance. Any guesses as to how?
Sincerely,
David Lang
Accordance Developer
http://www.accordancebible.com

Author:
Feet to Follow, Eyes to See
http://feettofollow.wordpress.com

Macs in the Ministry
http://www.macsinministrybook.com

Leader of the "Lang Gang"
http://www.langgangland.com
http://twitter.com/DavidAllenLang

#3 ryangeer

ryangeer

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:9.x

Posted 01 September 2009 - 10:33 AM

A search for ntsl in the bhs - limited to inf. cons. form shows the word in its correct spelling...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users