Please see my answer here.
7 votes
Expositor's Bible Commentary
Started by
Helen Brown
, Jan 06 2011 07:34 PM
43 replies to this topic
#41
Helen Brown
-
- Admin
-
- 6,847 posts
Mithril
- Gender:Female
- Location:heart in Israel
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:51 PM
Helen Brown
OakTree Software
OakTree Software
#42
Lance
-
- Active Members
-
- 114 posts
Silver
- Gender:Male
- Location:Melbourne, (Australia)
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 06 May 2013 - 03:02 AM
Helen,
I'd like to revive this thread to ask a clarification on something that's been touched on by others already. Other than the introductory articles in EBC, is there a practical reason one might want to retain the EBC alongside the EBC-R? Or does the very fact that it's been revised imply that the latter is more up-to-date (or more whatever …) than the former?
I just don't want to have unnecessary duplication in my Library.
Thanks.
Blessings!
Lance <º))><
MBP late-2011 (10.8.2), iPhone 4, iPad 2
Lance <º))><
MBP late-2011 (10.8.2), iPhone 4, iPad 2
#43
Julie Falling
-
- Active Members
-
- 736 posts
Platinum
- Gender:Female
- Location:Tennessee
- Interests:kids, grandkids, Bible Study, Greek, teaching Sunday school, pets, reading, cooking, baking, music, gardening, rational hiking (NOT backpacking!)
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 06 May 2013 - 08:57 AM
There are different authors for some of the commentaries. I use both the EBC and the EBC-R. Yes, there is overlap, but sometimes the content for a given Bible book is completely different. Watch Dr. J's podcast, #81. He lists some of the changes in authorships.
#44
Sean R.
-
- Active Members
-
- 276 posts
Gold
- Gender:Male
- Location:Russellville, TN
- Accordance Version:10.x
Posted 06 May 2013 - 09:18 AM
Here's a graphic that should help one understand the scope of the revision to the EBC:
http://viewer.zmags....ec#/324db2ec/11
Sean Reed
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
