Jump to content


Photo

Peshitta morph search


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 David Knoll

David Knoll

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 12:23 AM

I am looking at Exod 1:16 in the Peshitta OT. The word ‎ܕܒܪܟܢ is tagged as ‎ܒܪܟ_0 in the peal stem. When I search the lemma ‎ܒܪܟ_0 @ [ANY peal] or [VERB peal] I get Gen 27:33 and Deut 7:14 but not Exod 1:16. What am I doing wrong?

#2 Helen Brown

Helen Brown

    Mithril

  • Admin
  • 8,428 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:heart in Israel
  • Accordance Version:11.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 12:38 AM

I tried your searches and both gave me the correct results. Are you using Accordance 9.3.3?
Helen Brown
OakTree Software

#3 David Knoll

David Knoll

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 12:43 AM

I tried your searches and both gave me the correct results. Are you using Accordance 9.3.3?

Yep.

Attached Files


Edited by David Knoll, 10 June 2011 - 12:52 AM.


#4 jpkang

jpkang

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Comparative Semitics; ancient Hebrew semantics; Hebrew syntax; history and religion of ancient Israel; history of interpretation.
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 12:56 AM

I don't see the @ that should join the two elements in your search.

As pictured, you're searching for the first word followed by a peal.
J. P. Kang, Ph.D. (Bible)

#5 David Knoll

David Knoll

    Silver

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 178 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 01:04 AM

I don't see the @ that should join the two elements in your search.

As pictured, you're searching for the first word followed by a peal.

Oops...
In my defence I am a newbie...
Apologies

#6 jpkang

jpkang

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Comparative Semitics; ancient Hebrew semantics; Hebrew syntax; history and religion of ancient Israel; history of interpretation.
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 10 June 2011 - 01:06 AM

You had the syntax correct in your initial post which was why I thought it odd that it wasn't in your screenshot!
J. P. Kang, Ph.D. (Bible)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users