Placement of Rom 14:24-26 in GNT-BYZ
#1
Posted 27 December 2011 - 08:06 AM
Is there any way to place Rom 14:24-26 (= Rom 16:25-27 in NA27) in its proper place in the GNT-BYZ module, or would this mess up the parallel-text programming? Actually, I'm not even sure where to look in Accordance to find out that the verses Rom 14:24-26 are not even where they stand in the printed edition. Can somebody help?
Rom 14:24-26 represents a rather significant block of text that has been translocated to the end of the book, and some Byzantine-priority advocates point to this as an example of the preservation of the pre-canonical form of Romans in most manuscripts, while the UBS/NA27 placement represents the polished editorial position it received for a later "canonical edition." By the way, I believe Jakob van Bruggen is preparing an article on this very issue due to be published in a collection in 2012.
Sincerely,
Jonathan C. Borland
#2
Posted 27 December 2011 - 09:44 AM
Screen Shot 2011-12-27 at 9.38.45 AM.jpg 310.12K
21 downloads
Screen Shot 2011-12-27 at 9.38.49 AM.jpg 310.15K
22 downloads
Project Manager, Module Development
iOS Working Group
#3
Posted 28 December 2011 - 12:36 AM
Ah, so that's how to do it. Thank you! I'm a brand new Accordance user and just figuring out how to do things on it.
I did notice, however, that Rom 14:24-26 comes up just fine (i.e., after Rom 14:23) in the iOS for the GNT-BYZ module. I like that better, and wonder why the desktop version can't do it that way.
Sincerely,
Jonathan C. Borland
A Textual Commentary of the Greek New Testament
#4
Posted 28 December 2011 - 12:40 AM
#5
Posted 28 December 2011 - 12:47 AM
Oh, I see what I must have done. I started playing around with the GNT-T module which doesn't have Rom 14:24-26 in that place. Later, I added the GNT-BYZ text pane and was playing around. I eventually closed the GNT-T text pane, which left me with only the GNT-BYZ text pane open. But when playing around with GNT-BYZ, Rom 14:24-26 remained absent, I guess because it was still somehow synced to GNT-T, even though GNT-T has already been closed. Does this sound right?
Sincerely,
Jonathan
#6
Posted 28 December 2011 - 01:35 AM
OakTree Software
#7
Posted 28 December 2011 - 10:24 AM
Dear Rick,
Oh, I see what I must have done. I started playing around with the GNT-T module which doesn't have Rom 14:24-26 in that place. Later, I added the GNT-BYZ text pane and was playing around. I eventually closed the GNT-T text pane, which left me with only the GNT-BYZ text pane open. But when playing around with GNT-BYZ, Rom 14:24-26 remained absent, I guess because it was still somehow synced to GNT-T, even though GNT-T has already been closed. Does this sound right?
Sincerely,
Jonathan
Sorry, I'm now a bit confused myself. If you haven't figured it out, post a screen shot of your current workspace and I can annotate it with an explanation of how the texts are displayed, sync, etc.
Project Manager, Module Development
iOS Working Group
#8
Posted 28 December 2011 - 05:15 PM
By the way, as a new user of Accordance, it was not intuitive to me that a text could be open but not be using the verse numbering for that text! But now I understand why. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











