Jump to content


Photo

HCSB update


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Outis

Outis

    Gold

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 242 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:West Newton, PA
  • Interests:Hiking, Mountain Biking, Swimming,Translating Hebrew & Greek, good coffee, loose-leaf tea, homebrewing, stinky candles.
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 11:43 AM

Hello,

 

I noticed that the HCSB was updated from version 1.1 to 1.3.  Where can I go to find what was entailed in the update?

 


Pastor Steve Bauer

stevebauer.us
pastorbauer--> at <--gmail.com

sic fatvs nocti se miscvit atrae...

#2 JonathanHuber

JonathanHuber

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 740 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Englewood, CO
  • Interests:Bible study, Greek
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 12:03 PM

Part of Mark 13:31 was missing and is now corrected. I don't know if there were other changes.



#3 James Tucker

James Tucker

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 644 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 12:55 PM

I've requested before that a list of changes be made, and published with each update. Such a practice offers the user precision and ἀκρίβεια that should enable a footnote citation to pinpoint specifically what the source is that has been consulted. Should something change in a resource, the scholar and reader has record of what has changed and version what consulted. These are the things that will make electronic resources more respected and valued. While the print page is static, it doesn't change.


  • Michael J. Bolesta and Abram K-J like this

#4 Abram K-J

Abram K-J

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,568 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greater Boston, MA
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 01:02 PM

^^ agreed.


Abram K-J
Pastor, Writer, Freelance Editor, Youth Ministry Consultant, Blogger
Web: Words on the Word


#5 Michael J. Bolesta

Michael J. Bolesta

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 678 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Addison TX
  • Interests:scripture study, preaching, teaching
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 01:51 PM

I've requested before that a list of changes be made, and published with each update. Such a practice offers the user precision and ἀκρίβεια that should enable a footnote citation to pinpoint specifically what the source is that has been consulted. Should something change in a resource, the scholar and reader has record of what has changed and version what consulted. These are the things that will make electronic resources more respected and valued. While the print page is static, it doesn't change.

 

Good idea.


Michael


#6 Rick Bennett

Rick Bennett

    Platinum

  • Accordance
  • 1,803 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa Bay, FL
  • Interests: gadgets, coffee, running and cycling, Rays baseball
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 03:04 PM

Generally speaking if you see a dot update to a module the changes are minor: reported typos, issues with links, tagging corrections, formatting edits, etc. A whole number update will add content (page numbers), features, publisher mandated updates (bible texts), etc. We try to report the latter via the forums or blog when necessitated. For the dot updates we have felt that it isn't worth the manpower / time to administer a detailed list of updates for every module.

 

I hope this helps to explain things.


  • Outis and Abram K-J like this

Rick Bennett
Director of Content Development
iOS Working Group


#7 Michael J. Bolesta

Michael J. Bolesta

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 678 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Addison TX
  • Interests:scripture study, preaching, teaching
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 23 April 2013 - 03:42 PM

Thanks Rick.


Michael





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users