Jump to content


Photo

Showing search results simultaneously over multiple tagged texts


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 davidmorgenstern

davidmorgenstern

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco

Posted 31 May 2013 - 05:03 PM

Suppose I have a workspace with several tagged texts open and do a search. Wouldn't I want the results to be displayed in all of the open, tagged texts, English or whatever? They are all linked after all with the Strong's Numbers. 

 

david m.



#2 Andrew Mercer

Andrew Mercer

    Member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 43 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mullaloo, Western Australia
  • Interests:The Bible, NT Greek, music, rugby, family - and a whole lot more
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 01 June 2013 - 02:11 AM

Hi David

 

If you have the tagged texts open in one zone, the search will display the verses in the other texts. You can then hover over the search result in the version that the search was undertaken and the corresponding words are highlighted in the other texts. I have attached a screen shot. If this doesn't answer your question, hopefully someone more knowledgeable will chime in soon.

Attached Files


Blessings,
 
Andrew Mercer
Summerlakes Church
Malaga, Western Australia

#3 Ken Simpson

Ken Simpson

    Platinum

  • Accordance
  • 1,559 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Astronomy
    Archaeology
    Physics
    Hebrew and Greek
    Papyrology
    Orthopædic Surgery
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 01 June 2013 - 02:30 AM

I'm not sure Andrew's screenshot quite worked. Here is what he is talking about.

 

Attached File  Accordance.png   473.08KB   25 downloads

 

However, as you correctly pointed out, a search won't show a "hit" in the other texts, since the search was not on that text.

 

You can combine the search idea with the Andrew's example above like this.

 

Attached File  Accordance-1.png   430.92KB   25 downloads


Edited by Ken Simpson, 01 June 2013 - 02:33 AM.

Regards
Ken
Lead Australian Accordance Demonstrator

Administrator, Accordance Exchange

Assistant Minister, Summer Hill Church


#4 Ken Simpson

Ken Simpson

    Platinum

  • Accordance
  • 1,559 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Astronomy
    Archaeology
    Physics
    Hebrew and Greek
    Papyrology
    Orthopædic Surgery
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 01 June 2013 - 02:38 AM

Here's another idea. If you open your texts in separate zones (by dragging them)

 

you can use the LINK command to repeat the search in each of the opened zones. Then whenever you change the initial linked to search, all of them will change at once

 

Attached File  E0FECA1B-083B-4920-90A3-A71D321228D6.png   930.15KB   21 downloads


Edited by Ken Simpson, 01 June 2013 - 02:40 AM.

Regards
Ken
Lead Australian Accordance Demonstrator

Administrator, Accordance Exchange

Assistant Minister, Summer Hill Church


#5 Julie Falling

Julie Falling

    Platinum

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,221 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Tennessee
  • Interests:Numerous!
  • Accordance Version:10.x

Posted 01 June 2013 - 07:56 AM

Nice, Ken.  A good way, too, to compare how different versions translate a given word.  Analytics could be opened for each zone so that results are viewed simultaneously.

 

P.S. I played with this a bit. It works great with keyed texts as long as you aren't trying to do simultaneous searches that include a key word where the texts are tied to different numbering systems. Basically, you run into problems if one of your texts is the NAS95S, the KJVS, or some version of the NIV. I did some searches with the NAS95 and NIV11 both linked to the ESV.  Not surprisingly, I got some odd results, and sometimes  the NAS95 didn't do a search at all (where the NAS95 number had a lower case letter after the number, e.g. 19b).  This is not an Accordance problem.  It's just the systems used by the publishers, I guess.  Anyway, it's good to be aware up front that you may get some odd results.


Edited by Julie Falling, 02 June 2013 - 05:35 PM.

Julia Falling

 

Accordance 

MacBook Air Yosemite

mid-2013 1.7 GHz Intel Core i7 (2 cores)

8 GB RAM; 512 G SSD

 

Mac mini Yosemite

late-2012 2.3GHz Intel Core i7 (4 cores)

16 GB RAM; 1.12  TB Fusion Drive

 

iPad Air 1 iOS 8.1

64 GB

 

 

 

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users