Jump to content


Why does the "not" search tag not work?

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Enoch



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 842 posts

Posted 04 August 2014 - 12:03 AM

I just searched moses mount <NOT> sinai in the ASV 

and got the "no verses in range" drop down response, though there surely are verses that have moses and mount, but not sinai. 


When I searched moses mount, among the results was this:


"And Moses went up from the plains of Moab unto mount Nebo, to the top of Pisgah, that is over against Jericho." 

Edited by Enoch, 15 August 2014 - 06:55 PM.

#2 Joe Weaks

Joe Weaks


  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,280 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Odessa, TX
  • Interests:I like things that are Orange, and possibly Blue.
  • Accordance Version:11.x

Posted 04 August 2014 - 01:45 AM

Well, first off, that text you give as Numbers 33:29 comes up for me as Deut 34:1.


Secondly, you're doing a Flex search, which I would expect funny results when using something like <NOT>. Flex search is designed for when you're not using those booleans. Try your search like this:

moses <AND> mount <NOT> sinai

to see the results you're expecting.

Joe Weaks
The Macintosh Biblioblog

Sometimes I'm so helpful even I can't stand it.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users