100 Archaeological Sites and Biblical Landscapes in Israel?

[Abram K-J]

I've spent time with this module's product page, and am still having a hard time knowing where it differs, say, from the PhotoGuide. The product page to 100 Archaeological Sites shows "Dead Sea," which PhotoGuide also has an entry for, though I can't tell from the 100 Archaeological Sites screenshot how detailed it might be.

 

A lot of the sites/places in the tool browser in that screenshot are also included in the PhotoGuide.

I'm wondering: what sets apart the two resources from each other? What would someone with the PhotoGuide (whether 3 or 4) gain by having 100 Archaeological Sites, too? What would they lose by just using the PhotoGuide with something like The Sacred Bridge?

[PhilT]

I have the same question as Abram. In addition, does this work do archaeological reconstructions?

[Helen Brown]

The images are different and there are more of them on these sites, and the details of the remains and excavations are much fuller. The original text is by the writer who produced the official site guides on many of these places. So it's a complementary work with hardly any actual overlap in content.

[Abram K-J]

Thanks!