David Knoll Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 Are they available in Accordance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted July 6, 2015 Share Posted July 6, 2015 I do not think they have been added yet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Knoll Posted July 6, 2015 Author Share Posted July 6, 2015 Thank you! Will they be added in the near future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Holmstedt Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 I have hesitated to add any of the new K.Q. texts to the Accordance module since there is no consensus on the readings yet. To wit, I recently heard one of the primary early alphabet scholars argue that the first K.Q. ostracon was written top-to-bottom! Until there is greater agreement on the readings of the texts (not the letters so much, but the interpretation of the letters into words, etc.), I will not likely include these new ostraca for the database, which by nature includes a number of layers of interpretation I am as of yet uncomfortable making. I trust that make sense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Knoll Posted July 11, 2015 Author Share Posted July 11, 2015 First of all thank you for your reply. For some reason I did not get notified by mail that a reply had been added. Can these texts be added as is, in other words without morphology? I doubt whether anyone will ever be able to decipher the first one with absolute certainty (Do you think it's Hebrew?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Holmstedt Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 (edited) Yes, I could add the texts without morphology and syntax layers. Hebrew? How about I agree that it's Semitic of a north-westerly kind? :-) Edited July 11, 2015 by Robert Holmstedt 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Knoll Posted July 11, 2015 Author Share Posted July 11, 2015 Thank you. I am happy to hear I am not the only skeptic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now