Jump to content

Thanks for hidden original languages gems


Michel Gilbert

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I read the complete list of what's new at http://www.accordancebible.com/New-Since-11/ and discovered some hidden gems.

 

Thanks for the Qatal/Yiqtol terms that can be set at Preferences > Greek & Hebrew.

 

post-32543-0-11645900-1446574390_thumb.png

 

And, thanks for the "support for tagged transliteration texts, such as upcoming tagged Ugaritic." Did I miss something, or is this the first official announcement?

 

Regards,

 

Michel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And, thanks for the "support for tagged transliteration texts, such as upcoming tagged Ugaritic." Did I miss something, or is this the first official announcement?

 

Surprise! Actually, I don't know if it had been mentioned before this or not. Nevertheless, it will be available very soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Helen,

 

I think I can guess who's doing the tagging. Assuming he started in the spring at the earliest, it would be quite an accomplishment to have tagged most of the texts already. So, I understand "the complete text, not so much."

 

But I'm glad there will be an announcement soon, and that it is happening.

 

Regards,

 

Michel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just out of curiosity, are there any plans to do a training or a podcast on the Ugaritic materials?   I'm assuming that the new tagged texts module will be self-explanatory, but I would benefit from a brief tutorial on the Ugaritic database module.  For whatever reason, this is the only module in my library that is not making sense to me, in terms of how it might be utilized.  

 

I have used KTU2, CTA, CAT, and read through many of the texts in Pardee's grammar (which uses RS reference numbers), but this module is not making sense to me.  I get the feeling that I am missing something very simple . . .

 

Thanks,

 

David 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll admit that I was confused by it at first, too, David. The 00-recension is always the "main" recension. All the recensions such as R1 and 10 are case sensitive, meaning that they differ on the text in question. For instance, in UDB 1.1, the different recensions are based on the following:

00-1.  1

KTU, M. Dietrich – O. Loretz – J. Sanmartín, Die Keilalphabetischen Texte aus Ugarit (Neukirchen-Vluyn, 1976).

 

10-1.  1

Smith, Mark S., The Ugaritic Baal Cycle. Volume 1. Introduction with Text, Translation and Commentary of KTU 1.1–1.2. Leiden- New York – Köln 1994, pp. 117–209.

 

R1-1.  1

 

Lab. de Hermeneumática, Ugaritic Data Bank. Modules I and II. Madrid 1999.

 

(These data are found just below the Bibliographical data for each tablet)

Edited by Peter Brylov Christensen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Peter!  I appreciate it.   I will be doing some work with Ugaritic this weekend, and will use this note as reference.   I'll message you if I have any other questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...