Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Hi ya, I've been trying to define ranges that are smaller than verses which of course is not supported - see my recent define range posts. So I thought I would try highlights and see if a [sTYLE ?] predicate could achieve the same thing. It seems it cannot. See the result below : I have also tried was@[sTYLE Bear] but this is not permitted. I tried changing the search scope to clause but that is not supported for [sTYLE ?] queries. While I guess that this is not a bug in the strict sense, that is this is working as designed, it seems counter-intuitive. ThxD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 [sTYLE] searches are are a verse-level search, not word-level. So, your search results are correct, as you are asking Accordance "what verses have 'was' and a highlight of by style 'Bear'?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 25, 2016 Author Share Posted April 25, 2016 Thanx Joel, that's more or less the conclusion I came to. Is there any way to achieve what I'm looking for in Acc at present, that is, to constrain a search to an arbitrary user defined range of words ? Thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 No, I do not believe there is. Sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted April 25, 2016 Author Share Posted April 25, 2016 Ok, Thanx - when I have a minute I'll write up a feature request. Thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now