Jump to content


Version 7... a Universal binary?

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 frphotios



  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 28 May 2006 - 02:30 AM

Forgive me, if I missed this somewhere, but I'm trying to ascertain if version 7 is a univeral binary, to run natively on the intel machines. Anyone know?


#2 Helen Brown

Helen Brown


  • Admin
  • 11,167 posts
  • Twitter:accordancebible
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:heart in Israel
  • Accordance Version:12.x
  • Platforms:Mac OS X, Windows, iOS, Android

Posted 28 May 2006 - 04:22 AM

No, it is not Universal Binary, but it runs just fine on Intel machines. We do plan to port version 7 to Universal Binary later, but we had other priorities for this first release.
Helen Brown
OakTree Software

#3 Joe Weaks

Joe Weaks


  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,279 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Odessa, TX
  • Interests:I like things that are Orange, and possibly Blue.
  • Accordance Version:11.x

Posted 29 May 2006 - 08:09 PM

Anyone done benchmarks yet?
Apps using Rosetta on an Intel Mac for the most part run slower than on G5 counterparts in the tests being done. (Adobe apps, for instance)
Joe Weaks
The Macintosh Biblioblog

Sometimes I'm so helpful even I can't stand it.

#4 jpkang



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 585 posts
  • Twitter:MyMacHero
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Comparative Semitics; ancient Hebrew semantics; Hebrew syntax; history and religion of ancient Israel; history of interpretation.
  • Accordance Version:12.x
  • Platforms:Mac OS X, iOS

Posted 30 May 2006 - 04:48 PM

Anyone done benchmarks yet?
Apps using Rosetta on an Intel Mac for the most part run slower than on G5 counterparts in the tests being done. (Adobe apps, for instance)

Anecdotally, I compared three systems running Accordance 7.0 under OS X 10.4.6:

12.1" PowerBook G4/1.33 GHz/768MB RAM
13.3" MacBook Core Duo/2.0 GHz/2GB RAM
G5 Quad/2.5 GHz/4.5GB RAM

All Energy Saver settings on all three machines were "Normal," i.e. Processor Performance was "Automatic," and Accordance was the only active app.

As expected, the G5 was definitely much faster than either laptop, but I don't know whether this is primarily due to multiprocessor threading or faster bus/clock speeds and/or cache. The MacBook was typically as fast as the PowerBook, but sometimes dramatically faster (like searching for all words in a tagged Hebrew or Greek text, for which the MacBook appeared to be at least twice as fast). Generating a concordance of the entire Hebrew Bible took about the same time on both laptops.

One thing I did notice was that Rosetta seems to go dormant when an emulated program is not being actively used, so that doing a new, processor-intensive operation after it has been sitting without any input for a few minutes would take longer to start than if it had been executed in quick succession to another operation.

So expect your mileage to vary, but at least I predict most people won't notice any slowdown of Accordance on Intel Macs (with the possible exception of the Core Solo Mac mini), and given that most Accordance search results appear (impressionistically) instantaneous, there's not a whole lot of improvement we could hope for!

Edited by jpkang, 30 May 2006 - 05:06 PM.

J. P. Kang, Ph.D. (Bible)

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users