Randy Cue Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I just noticed how the information given in a footnote has changed from version 9 to version 10. Here is an example of what I mean. That is quite a difference. I prefer the one from version 9. Is there any chance it will go back to that information form? Soli Deo Gloria, Randy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 If that is how it was in v. 9 it was wrong. Based on the Turabian style you have chosen the entry should be cited in parentheses not the lexicon, i.e. s.v. "πληοφορια" is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Cue Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 O.K. Rick, thanks. Soli Deo Gloria, Randy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Sorry to bother you again, Rick. Here is another example. Is the version 10 method correct here also? The version 9 certainly has more information. Soli Deo Gloria, Randy That's odd. I'm not sure why there's a difference since the same database is used in v. 9 & 10. What version of 9 is that? I'll look further into it, but may need to screen share to check some things on your end, but I won't have time to do that until Monday. In the mean time if anyone else can confirm this it would help to know if it is an issue on Randy's install or universal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Cue Posted August 24, 2012 Author Share Posted August 24, 2012 Rick, don't bother. The bottom quote is not from Accordance. I am so sorry to have bothered you. Soli Deo Gloria, Randy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now