Martin Shields Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Hello, I'm trying to search for a phrase such as "τῇ διδαχῇ αὐτοῦ" in Matt 7:28 using a graphically constructed search, but I'm obviously doing something wrong. Here's the syntax: If I do a search for a "Complement Phrase" it is included in the results. If, however, I then add the article under the first section of the complement phrase, it is no longer included: I can probably achieve this without resorting to a syntax search, but I'd like to work this out. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 HI Martin, I've had a look at this and it doesn't behave the way I thought it should (and obviously as you thought it should). Just posting to bump it and see if anyone can suggest a solution... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Holmstedt Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I looked at it, but the phrase structure differs from how we've tagged articles in the Hebrew texts. I don't have access to the raw tagging files for the Greek, so I can't even try to figure it out for you. It will have to bumped to Marco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Hi ya, I've played with this a bit now as I recently got the syntax module for the GNT-T and have been wanting to try it out a bit. Had to read a bunch of stuff and still do not really know what I'm doing. But below are three queries. One very broad that will find Matt 7:28 based on your initial post. Then one that I thought should have worked based on the syntax diagram but it did not. Then finally after many variations one that does find Matt 7:28 and similar constructions. If anyone can explain what I did I'd be really interested to understand it. To me the search I constructed does not appear to reflect the syntax diagram so I am not sure how these the search and diagram relate to one another. And along the way I found many as yet curious results. I am yet to go through Marco's posts on various syntax searches but there does not appear to be one aimed at precisely this sort of search, at least at a quick glance. For comparison purposes I got 15 hits in 8 verses - Matt, Mark and Jn and the Jn could be excluded by including only dative articles I would think. BTW I also don't fully understand the hit count here. Need to look at that a bit. Anyhow enjoy - time for me to do vocab drills. Thx D Fails.tiff Works.tiff Works2.tiff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 We've taken a look at this, and it definitely seems to be a somewhat serious bug in Accordance, that we should fix for 10.1.3. Sorry about the hassle! In principle, the construct should work just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Hi Joel, Thanx for checking it out. I tried one of Marco's examples as well this evening. I have opened another topic on it : Searching for particles example not working. Perhaps they are related issues. thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Shields Posted January 9, 2013 Author Share Posted January 9, 2013 Thanks everyone. At least it isn't just me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now