Neill Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Any chance of seeing a Septuagint Day sale on Septuagint resources? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abram K-J Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 (edited) I haven't used it so can't speak to it at all, but it is worth noting that Accordance alone (at least among major softwares) offers the Cambridge LXX apparatus. And it's not very expensive, either. Edited February 8, 2013 by AbramKJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 (edited) I haven't used it so can't speak to it at all, but it is worth nothing that Accordance alone (at least among major softwares) offers the Cambridge LXX apparatus. And it's not very expensive, either. Really Abram? Worth *nothing*??? ;-) Don't you hate the combination of autocorrect, not proof reading, and a big inviting "post" button...,? Edited February 8, 2013 by Ken Simpson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abram K-J Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Correction made. It was more the combination of each of my three under-five children in the room (variously asking for attention) that probably led to that.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abram K-J Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 But while we're at it, I think you want a question mark at the end of that last comment. Back to the topic--I know Accordance recommends the Swete text for use with the Cambridge apparatus (since they match), but I've always wondered if one could still profitably make use of just the apparatus, alongside Rahlfs, which though different from Swete could still get the job done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 (edited) But while we're at it, I think you want a question mark at the end of that last comment. ] Correction made :-) Back to the topic--I know Accordance recommends the Swete text for use with the Cambridge apparatus (since they match), but I've always wondered if one could still profitably make use of just the apparatus, alongside Rahlfs, which though different from Swete could still get the job done? Can't help you there, sorry. It makes some sense to me, but I am no LXX scholar nor Accordance developer. Edited February 8, 2013 by Ken Simpson 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now