I think I'm about to bite the bullet and get the Accordance Q module. I know this is not the place to discuss theology, personal views, etc., so I'll not here elaborate on my skepticism about Q's actual existence, but I can see how the module would be helpful either way.
What I'm curious about is the possibility of a sort of Q for Q. If Jesus spoke Aramaic, then even whatever Greek source the Gospel writers used (to whatever extent they used sources) was already a translation of some kind.
It's a complicated issue, to be sure, but what I wonder if any of you know: has anyone attempted a reconstruction of all the words of Jesus in what they venture would have been the original Aramaic?
This is not an Accordance-specific question, but I don't know a smarter group of folks online to ask than the people on these forums. Also, if such a thing did exist, getting it in Accordance (tagged or not) would be awesome.