Joel Arnold Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 I just ran this search on both UBS Greek NT and NA 28. [PRONOUN personal plural] All I get is forms of autos, as though the first and second person don't exist. If I take out the plural, the others suddenly appear. It get's weirder. If I search for either of these I get a message that none exist. [PRONOUN personal second plural] [PRONOUN personal second singular] But searching without a number marker gives me both singular (su forms) and plural (umeis forms). What am I doing wrong here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 Interesting - it looks like the tagging in those cases do not include a plural tag : Matt. 5:11 μακάριοί ἐστε ὅταν ὀνειδίσωσιν ὑμᾶς καὶ διώξωσιν καὶ εἴπωσιν πᾶν πονηρὸν καθ᾿ ὑμῶν [ψευδόμενοι] ἕνεκεν ἐμοῦ. Instant Details: ὑμᾶς humas σύ su Pronoun (pers) 2 acc you; you people (when pl) (Complement)[ESVS] G4771 you I wondering if this is deliberate for some reason - certainly leads to unexpected results. Thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julia Falling Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 I get the same result searching the NA28 & NA27, but the LXX is tagged with number as well as person. Odd. Complete tagging here would be better, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 The tagging is complete, we are investigating the bug. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now