Enoch Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 When I searched today for Mark 9:45 in the ASV (1901), I got the rebuke pop up telling me that verse did not exist. When I searched for Mark 9:46, I got a result, namely Mark 9:45. The ASV module has no 9:46. It does have 9:45, but the result is that it doesn't go there but gives you the error popup. For Mark 9:46 should not the result be that "This Version omits 9:46"? You may want to check out 9:44 as well. I wonder if there is a standard way to handle verses which are in the KJV, but not in modern translations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 We have a fix in the works for your last point, so that Accordance will display parallel verses that are missing in the search text. It's a few weeks away from release yet. However, searching for a verse in a version where it is missing, I don't know how we can improve that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Enoch, this was actually a bug in Accordance's determination for missing verses. Aside from Helen's upcoming improvement, you should see this fixed when 11.1.5 goes live. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now