Jump to content

Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5


Ιακοβ

Recommended Posts

I wonder if someone could help me identify which accordance module "Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5," might be in, if any?

 

Sosthenes’ inclusion in the Seventy (Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5, in Eus., EH 1. 12. 1–2) doubtless reflects his assumed participation in a canonical letter.

 
“Sosthenes,” NBD, 1124. accord://read/IVP-NB_Dictionary#15941
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=AFL-Thas the 1. and 2. Clem. post-32723-0-34156100-1467789199_thumb.png

 

http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=Philo%20add-onor (http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=PHILO-T?) has Hypoth. post-32723-0-86122500-1467789537_thumb.png

 

http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=EUSEB-Thas Euseb. post-32723-0-78774800-1467789861_thumb.png

 

I didn't found Alex. or I didn't know which module this is.

 

Greetings

 

Fabian

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooooh! I thought "Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5" was a reference to a chapter of a single resource, your suggesting "Clem." "Alex." and "Hyp. 5" are all separate resources.

 

I thought It was suggesting there was a chapter five of something by a "Clement of Alexandrea" in a work called "Hyp."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jacob, it’s from Ecclesiastical History by Eusebius,  referring to Clement of Alexandira’s Fifth book of Hypotyposes, of which there are only fragments remaining.

 

The Same, Book V. On Galatians 5:24.

“And they that are Christ’s [have crucified] the flesh.” And why mention one aspect of virtue after another? For there are some who have crucified themselves as far as the passions are concerned, and the passions as far as respects themselves. According to this interpretation the “and” is not superfluous. “And they that are Christ’s” — that is, striving after Him — “have crucified their own flesh.”

Moschus: Spiritual Meadow, Book V. Chap. 176.

Yes, truly, the apostles were baptised, as Clement the Stromatist relates in the fifth book of the Hypotyposes. For, in explaining the apostolic statement, “I thank God that I baptised none of you,” he says, Christ is said to have baptised Peter alone, and Peter Andrew, and Andrew John, and they James and the rest.1

Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, eds., Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria, ANF II; Accordance electronic ed. 9 vols.; (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1885), paragraph 17247.

 

or...accord://read/CF-AN#17247

 

that’s in the Ante-Nicene Fathers module.

 

 

"In particular, he (Photios I of Constantinople) is highly critical of the Hypotyposes, a work of biblical exegesis of which only a few fragments have survived."

Edited by Ken Simpson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jacob, it’s from Ecclesiastical History by Eusebius,  referring to Clement of Alexandira’s Fifth book of Hypotyposes, of which there are only fragments remaining.

 

The Same, Book V. On Galatians 5:24.

“And they that are Christ’s [have crucified] the flesh.” And why mention one aspect of virtue after another? For there are some who have crucified themselves as far as the passions are concerned, and the passions as far as respects themselves. According to this interpretation the “and” is not superfluous. “And they that are Christ’s” — that is, striving after Him — “have crucified their own flesh.”

Moschus: Spiritual Meadow, Book V. Chap. 176.

Yes, truly, the apostles were baptised, as Clement the Stromatist relates in the fifth book of the Hypotyposes. For, in explaining the apostolic statement, “I thank God that I baptised none of you,” he says, Christ is said to have baptised Peter alone, and Peter Andrew, and Andrew John, and they James and the rest.1

Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, eds., Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria, ANF II; Accordance electronic ed. 9 vols.; (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1885), paragraph 17247.

 

or...accord://read/CF-AN#17247

 

that’s in the Ante-Nicene Fathers module.

 

 

"In particular, he (Photios I of Constantinople) is highly critical of the Hypotyposes, a work of biblical exegesis of which only a few fragments have survived."

I also looked in this module, but I was not sure. The link from IVP-NB module goes not to CF-AN.

 

Thanks

 

Greetings

 

Fabian

Edited by Fabian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...