Ιακοβ Posted July 6, 2016 Share Posted July 6, 2016 I wonder if someone could help me identify which accordance module "Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5," might be in, if any? Sosthenes’ inclusion in the Seventy (Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5, in Eus., EH 1. 12. 1–2) doubtless reflects his assumed participation in a canonical letter. “Sosthenes,” NBD, 1124. accord://read/IVP-NB_Dictionary#15941 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted July 6, 2016 Share Posted July 6, 2016 http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=AFL-Thas the 1. and 2. Clem. http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=Philo%20add-onor (http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=PHILO-T?) has Hypoth. http://www.accordancebible.com/store/details/?pid=EUSEB-Thas Euseb. I didn't found Alex. or I didn't know which module this is. Greetings Fabian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ιακοβ Posted July 6, 2016 Author Share Posted July 6, 2016 Oooooh! I thought "Clem. Alex., Hyp. 5" was a reference to a chapter of a single resource, your suggesting "Clem." "Alex." and "Hyp. 5" are all separate resources. I thought It was suggesting there was a chapter five of something by a "Clement of Alexandrea" in a work called "Hyp." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted July 6, 2016 Share Posted July 6, 2016 (edited) Hi Jacob, it’s from Ecclesiastical History by Eusebius, referring to Clement of Alexandira’s Fifth book of Hypotyposes, of which there are only fragments remaining. The Same, Book V. On Galatians 5:24. “And they that are Christ’s [have crucified] the flesh.” And why mention one aspect of virtue after another? For there are some who have crucified themselves as far as the passions are concerned, and the passions as far as respects themselves. According to this interpretation the “and” is not superfluous. “And they that are Christ’s” — that is, striving after Him — “have crucified their own flesh.” Moschus: Spiritual Meadow, Book V. Chap. 176. Yes, truly, the apostles were baptised, as Clement the Stromatist relates in the fifth book of the Hypotyposes. For, in explaining the apostolic statement, “I thank God that I baptised none of you,” he says, Christ is said to have baptised Peter alone, and Peter Andrew, and Andrew John, and they James and the rest.1 Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, eds., Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria, ANF II; Accordance electronic ed. 9 vols.; (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1885), paragraph 17247. or...accord://read/CF-AN#17247 that’s in the Ante-Nicene Fathers module. "In particular, he (Photios I of Constantinople) is highly critical of the Hypotyposes, a work of biblical exegesis of which only a few fragments have survived." Edited July 6, 2016 by Ken Simpson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted July 6, 2016 Share Posted July 6, 2016 (edited) Hi Jacob, it’s from Ecclesiastical History by Eusebius, referring to Clement of Alexandira’s Fifth book of Hypotyposes, of which there are only fragments remaining. The Same, Book V. On Galatians 5:24. “And they that are Christ’s [have crucified] the flesh.” And why mention one aspect of virtue after another? For there are some who have crucified themselves as far as the passions are concerned, and the passions as far as respects themselves. According to this interpretation the “and” is not superfluous. “And they that are Christ’s” — that is, striving after Him — “have crucified their own flesh.” Moschus: Spiritual Meadow, Book V. Chap. 176. Yes, truly, the apostles were baptised, as Clement the Stromatist relates in the fifth book of the Hypotyposes. For, in explaining the apostolic statement, “I thank God that I baptised none of you,” he says, Christ is said to have baptised Peter alone, and Peter Andrew, and Andrew John, and they James and the rest.1 Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, eds., Fathers of the Second Century: Hermas, Tatian, Athenagoras, Theophilus, and Clement of Alexandria, ANF II; Accordance electronic ed. 9 vols.; (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1885), paragraph 17247. or...accord://read/CF-AN#17247 that’s in the Ante-Nicene Fathers module. "In particular, he (Photios I of Constantinople) is highly critical of the Hypotyposes, a work of biblical exegesis of which only a few fragments have survived." I also looked in this module, but I was not sure. The link from IVP-NB module goes not to CF-AN. Thanks Greetings Fabian Edited July 6, 2016 by Fabian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now