Codex D incorrectly hyperlinked in NET Notes, UBS4th & UBS5th Apparatus

[Julia Falling]

In the Paulines, Codex D should be linked to D06 Claromontanus.  Instead, it is linked to D05 Cantabrigiensis.  This is true in both the NET Notes and UBS4th & 5th Apparatus.

 

The NA27th and NA28th are correctly hyperlinked.

 

Thanks.

 

EDIT:  If this topic needs to be moved elsewhere, thanks for moving.  I wasn't quite sure where to post.

Edited July 16, 2016 by Julie Falling

[R. Mansfield]

If this topic needs to be moved elsewhere, thanks for moving.  I wasn't quite sure where to post.

Technically, you can always just select the text in error choose "Report a Correction" from the contextual menu.

 

Thanks, regardless :-)

[Julia Falling]

I did that several years back for the UBS4th Apparatus.  It must have been lost in the shuffle somewhere because the error remains.  I posted here hoping for more visibility.  These three modules really do need to be fixed.

[R. Mansfield]

They shouldn't get missed anymore :-)

 

Although, you may want to resubmit the UBS 4 issue or send it to me to pass on.

 

The value of the emailed correction from the contextual menu is that it will go straight to those who will fix it, but they may or may not see them here.

[Julia Falling]

They shouldn't get missed anymore :-)

 

Although, you may want to resubmit the UBS 4 issue or send it to me to pass on.

 

The value of the emailed correction from the contextual menu is that it will go straight to those who will fix it, but they may or may not see them here.

 

I figured that if the error were seen by more people, and more official Accordance people, it would be more likely to get fixed.  As I said, a report has been submitted before.  I have no idea why it was missed.  Maybe there was some sort of server glitch.   

 

I have resent the UBS4th Apparatus report, as well as reports for UBS5th and NET Notes.  I've copied you on the reports.  I'm confident that the issue will be addressed.  Thanks.