Jump to content


Photo

Syntax search NOT excludes more than it should


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 דָנִיאֶל

דָנִיאֶל

    Mithril

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,424 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Accordance Version:12.x
  • Platforms:Mac OS X, Windows

Posted Yesterday, 10:25 PM

Hi ya,

 

  Acc 12.0

  Mac 10.11.6

 

  I made a bit of a pig's ear of explaining this as a feature enhancement the other day. I'll log this now as a bug but explain better (I hope) what I mean and provide a test case. I suspect this is not considered a bug in the strict sense as I think this is how it is coded to work. But the behaviour is a bit of a problem.

 

  In the attached workspace there are queries about predicate nominatives, which I'll say now is not related to the problem but they just happened to be what I was playing with at the time. The tabs are :

 

  Construct tabs

      Simple Nom Comp - a simple search for Noun Nominative Complements

      Pred Nom Comp - a simple search for Noun nominative complements inside a predicate phrase (for the curious, originally intended to remove the prepositional complements from the first query)

 

  Text Tabs

      Nom Comps - results from running Simple Nom Comp

      Pred Nom Comps - results from running Pred Nom Comp

      GNT Search NOT Search - the result of Nom Comp <NOT> Pred Nom Comp - ie. diff from the searches directly

      GNT Tab NOT Tab - the result of [CONTENTS Nom Comps] <NOT> [CONTENTS Pred Nom Comps] ie. diff the verses

 

  Ok so Nom Comps hits 782 verses and Pred Nom Comps 647. Yet GNT Search NOT Search only shows 15 hit verses. What you notice looking at it is that hit verses in Nom Comps which are not hits in Pred Nom Comps are also being removed by the NOT. This happens where both searches return hits in the same chapter even though Nom Comp query returns more verses in that chapter. This appears to be a consequence of the Chapter search scope.

 

  On scope then, it appears that searches for syntax can run with verse scope only if there are no clause/phrase elements in the search. Thus Simple Nom Comp can run with verse scope whereas Pred Nom Comp cannot and must use chapter which is the smallest scope for which the search will run.

 

  Returning to the searches then, by way of comparison, tab GNT Tab NOT Tab shows the different hit verses but of course there is no syntax search highlighting there anymore. I suspect in a simple case like this it could be added by adding Nom Comp to the search criteria as it can run at verse scope, and in fact it does. However, more complex cases would break here too, likely due to scope. Note this finds 137 hit verses which is actually two more than 782 - 647. This is just because Pred Nom Comp returns two verses not in Simple Nom Comp (Rom 9.29 and Rev 19.21). So it all reconciles properly in end.

 

  So can, something be done to permit diffs like this to be done with syntax queries ? It would be nice not to have use 3 tabs to do this and be able to retain the syntax search highlights.

 

Thx

D

 

Attached Files


Sola lingua bona est lingua mortua

ἡ μόνη ἀγαθὴ γλῶσσα γλῶσσα νεκρὰ ἐστιν

lišanu ēdēnitu damqitu lišanu mītu

 

Accordance Configurations :
 
Mac : 2009 27" iMac                 Windows : HP 4540s laptop
      Intel Core Duo                          Intel i5 Ivy Bridge
      12GB RAM                                8GB RAM
      Accordance 11.2.4 and 12                Accordance 11.1.6 and 12
      OSX 10.11 (Yosemite)                    Win 10 Professional x64





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users