Ken Simpson Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 While helping out on another topic looking for variant spellings of words in JDC I came across this strangeness that I would love some insight into. searching for timh@-“?im*” works nicely but when I changed it slightly to timh@-“*im*” the search failed with not found. I think I know why this is happening. but I experimented timh@-“??im*” failed - not found timh@-“???im*” worked but found exactly the same hits as timh@-“?im*” timh@-“????im*” failed - not found While I expected ??im*” and “????im*” (depending on the actual inflected forms in the corpus, I was surprised that “???im*” worked but seemingly found the wrong hits. All those searches worked fine as non-negated items so I am sure I am not getting my head around the boolean logic. The more I think about this the less it feels like a bug in Accordance and more like a bug in me. Thanks for insights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 These results are possible in theory but it will depend upon the attested forms of timh. Do you have a complete list ? I don't have the JDC. Thx D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Ken, what text is the 'JDC'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I assumed Judean Desert Corpus Thx D0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Simpson Posted January 28, 2017 Author Share Posted January 28, 2017 Yep. Daniel is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now