Julia Falling Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 (edited) The Strong's and GK numbers used to be hyperlinked. Mine aren't anymore. Is this a bug? Change in module? EDIT: The KM Hebrew has the same issue. Edited December 18, 2017 by Julia Falling 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Not sure what you mean by them being hyperlinked. Your screenshot looks normal to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julia Falling Posted December 18, 2017 Author Share Posted December 18, 2017 Previously, we could click on the numbers and have all the instances come up in a keyed English text. Now the GK and Strong's numbers are not hyperlinked. See this Mounce screencast @ 22:26 & on. We cannot do what he's talking about without the hyperlinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukfraser Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 (edited) Like in the expository dictionary (though only gk arelinked, not strongs) ;o) Edited December 19, 2017 by ukfraser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helen Brown Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 I see that in Mounce Greek the number of occurrences in the Greek text at the end of the first line is linked, and searches the Greek text when clicked. This link is currently missing in KM Hebrew. We will look into it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bennett Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 The Strong's and GK numbers used to be hyperlinked. Mine aren't anymore. Is this a bug? Change in module? Screen Shot 2017-12-18 at 3.57.42 PM.jpg EDIT: The KM Hebrew has the same issue. We changed the formatting some time ago, and moved the hyperlinks from the Gk/Strong's numbers to the individual text abbreviations. For KM Hebrew the frequencies are not linked due to the inability to uniquely identify the forms programmatically to ensure an accurate search in Accordance. And not all words have frequency counts. At the time we did not edit the dictionary further due to the time involved, but could possibly look into this for a future project. Thanks for the feedback. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julia Falling Posted December 19, 2017 Author Share Posted December 19, 2017 Thanks. I missed that change. We wouldn’t have noticed had we not been watching the Mounce video. It was using Accordance 9! Accordance has come a very long way since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now