jkdoyle Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Is there a good summary piece somewhere on the Accordance site (or elsewhere) which generally explains the differences between the BHS-T, HMT-W4, and the BHQ modules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketisdell Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 BHS-T and HMT-W4 are basically the same text with different tagging and apparatus. BHQ is the new addition of the critical text (replacing BHS) and it is not yet finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 I would add that if you plan to use the Hebrew syntax modules one is based on and must be used with the HMT-W4 text. That is the Holmstedt syntax model. If you want to use the syntax model out of WIVU in the Netherlands you will need the ETCBC Hebrew text. Thx D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 This question would make a good explanatory blog post. Adding the idea to my todo list. Thanks! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drmatt.thomas Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Another big difference between BHS-T and HMT-W4: BHS-T - includes the critical apparatus notes HMT-W4 - includes ketib-qere Unfortunately, neither includes both. I'm sure it has to do with licensing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSchrock Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 I also have the BHS-W4. How does that compare with the BHS-T? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Allison Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 (edited) Differences between our primary Hebrew Bibles. a. HMT-W4 (https://www.accordan...ils/?pid=HMT-W4). This is our 'main' Hebrew text. It includes the Westminister morphology. It is compatible with the Holmstedt Syntax database (https://www.accordan...d=HMT-W4.syntax). This is also receiving the most updates as necessary. b. BHS-T (https://www.accordan...ails/?pid=BHS-T). This is our 'main' Hebrew text with apparatus. It currently uses the Westminister morphology, but attached to text that follows the BHS instead of Leningrad. It also has the apparatus markings throughout the text to link to the BHS Apparatus information. However, there is currently no Syntax database that connects to it. So, HMT-W4 works with the Syntax database, but not with the apparatus, and the BHS-T works with the apparatus, but not with the Syntax database. Edited October 31, 2019 by Mark Allison Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Λύχνις Δαν Posted October 31, 2019 Share Posted October 31, 2019 I also have the BHS-W4. How does that compare with the BHS-T? This is the old main Hebrew text. Have a look at this post from Joel : https://www.accordancebible.com/forums/topic/21414-bhs-w4-to-hmt-w4-update/?do=findComment&comment=104399a couple of years back. Thx D 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now