rcdeacon Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 Is there any chance that we could see a tagged NLT? (NLT2S) Bob 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 The dynamic element of the NLT would make it a challenge. I wonder if Tyndale offers Strong's number correspondence in any of their print concordances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcdeacon Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 Rick, for whatever it is worth, my motivation for asking was our competitor DOES have the NLT as a tagged version. While I am NOT a Bible scholar there are some very helpful things (insights) I found in using the NLT. Chuck Swindoll seems to be using it a lot these days as well. It does give additional clarification in many instances. Bob 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Mansfield Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 Oh, you don't have to sell me on the NLT--it's a translation I'm very fond of :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcdeacon Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 Not sure how to go about this, but I am thinking Tyndale must have this with Strong's numbers since Logos has it and has had it for some time. Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now