John Fidel Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 When I have texts using GK numbers included in a group with texts using Strongs numbers and click on a word using live click, the results are still incorrect for the texts using a different numbering system. I thought there was a fix for this in the last update, but I am not seeing it. Acc 13.04 OS 10.14.6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Hey John, I'm using Windows 10 and the 'Improved a Live Click Research of key numbers to work better between Strong’s and GK' update has been implemented in 13.0.4, I've been testing it on various words. Maybe this is a Mac OS only issue but it's in the release notes for both Mac and Windows? Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted January 30, 2020 Author Share Posted January 30, 2020 Thanks for following up. Does it re-map the underlying number you click on so it is correct? The Mac version simply looks up the number regardless of whether it is GK or Strongs. I cannot have mixed numbered texts in the same group. Glad it is fixed for Windows. Just curious if it is something in my set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Hi John, I've just checked again and it's not fixed in Windows either, I thought it was... If I live click from a Strongs version (eg ESV) the versions using GK numbering are listed in the live click results but not actually shown (I had assumed they were in my quick check earlier). But if I live click from a GK numbering version (eg Mounce) then the versions using Strongs are listed and shown but the wrong word is shown as before. Here are a couple of screen shots using the word 'encourage' from 1Th 5:11 as before to illustrate the above two scenarios... Hopefully someone from Accordance can assist to fix... Thanks Paul 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted January 30, 2020 Author Share Posted January 30, 2020 Thanks Paul for the follow up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Just checking someone from Accordance has noted this? Seems the 'Improved a Live Click Research of key numbers to work better between Strong’s and GK' update in 13.0.4 isn't working in either MacOS or Windows... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 Checking someone from Accordance has noted this as no response to the above...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 I've made shortly after the release of Live Click a suggestion to improve this feature. So this is an issue since 1 1/2 year and nothing has done. Except Dr. J. mentioned in the Podcast after my suggestion to advertise Accordance this will not be addressed. So my hopes are very small. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 I've made shortly after the release of Live Click a suggestion to improve this feature. So this is an issue since 1 1/2 year and nothing has done. Except Dr. J. mentioned in the Podcast after my suggestion to advertise Accordance this will not be addressed. So my hopes are very small. Hopefully this is nearer to being realised, as the release notes for 13.0.4 stated 'Improved a Live Click Research of key numbers to work better between Strong’s and GK', after being discussed in a different thread, but unfortunately the update isn't working properly... Hopefully in 13.0.5 this will be fixed? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Allison Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 Further updates to GK/Strongs conversion are scheduled to be implemented in the 13.0.5 release. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 Hopefully this is nearer to being realised, as the release notes for 13.0.4 stated 'Improved a Live Click Research of key numbers to work better between Strong’s and GK', after being discussed in a different thread, but unfortunately the update isn't working properly... Hopefully in 13.0.5 this will be fixed? I have seen this, I read the release notes every time 2 or 3 X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 Further updates to GK/Strongs conversion are scheduled to be implemented in the 13.0.5 release. Thanks Mark - this is good news! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 (edited) Further updates to GK/Strongs conversion are scheduled to be implemented in the 13.0.5 release. Thats great to hear. I'm curious if the developers was inspired of my suggestion or not Edited February 13, 2020 by Fabian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Thanks Mark and Accordance Team, I have just updated to 13.0.5 and this is indeed fixed and so far is working beautifully! Fabian will be delighted I'm sure... Paul 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fabian Posted April 10, 2020 Share Posted April 10, 2020 Thanks Mark and Accordance Team, I have just updated to 13.0.5 and this is indeed fixed and so far is working beautifully! Fabian will be delighted I'm sure... Paul Yes I am. Greetings Fabian 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted April 11, 2020 Author Share Posted April 11, 2020 Excellent. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted April 11, 2020 Author Share Posted April 11, 2020 Please review the analytics when the live click search texts include both Strongs and GK numbers. The research search results are correct, but the analytical analysis by work or key number is still wrong. Here is a live click on the word prayer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 Please review the analytics when the live click search texts include both Strongs and GK numbers. The research search results are correct, but the analytical analysis by work or key number is still wrong. Here is a live click on the word prayer. Team Accordance, any word on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Please review the analytics when the live click search texts include both Strongs and GK numbers. The research search results are correct, but the analytical analysis by work or key number is still wrong. Here is a live click on the word prayer. Team Accordance, Just checking this has been picked up, as no response? Is this due to be corrected in 13.1? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 This is all working for me. I did a live click on a KEY G4335 word in ESV, opened up my analytics, and they are all showing correctly. If you are reproducing the error, pb, can you please post a from-empty-workspace sequence of steps that reliably reproduces it for you? Edit: Ah, that seems to be it! Mine set to just the book range seems to work more reliably, while no limit more reliably reproduces your error. Thanks for the report. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbgroover Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Thanks Joel, appreicate your following up on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 This is all working for me. I did a live click on a KEY G4335 word in ESV, opened up my analytics, and they are all showing correctly. If you are reproducing the error, pb, can you please post a from-empty-workspace sequence of steps that reliably reproduces it for you? Screen Shot 2020-05-06 at 1.16.39 PM.png Edit: Ah, that seems to be it! Mine set to just the book range seems to work more reliably, while no limit more reliably reproduces your error. Thanks for the report. Hi Joel, If you look at your screenshot, the analysis pane shows GK#s but the heading in the dropdown is Word, not Key Number. I reported this separately, but do not recall any reply from Accordance on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joel Brown Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Yes, that is a bug in the beta that has been logged, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Fidel Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 Thank you Joel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c3123c857d1029f98e39c9394adc358d.png)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now