Perspectives: On the Ending of Mark (4 Views) / January 01, 2008
Requires Accordance 10.4 or above.
Because it is conspicuously absent from more than one early Greek manuscript, the final section of the gospel of Mark (16:9-20) that details Christ’s resurrection remains a constant source of debate among serious students of the New Testament.
Perspectives on the Ending of Mark presents in counterpoint form the split opinions about this difficult passage with a goal of determining which is more likely.
- Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary professors Maurice Robinson and David Alan Black argue for the verses’ authenticity.
- Keith Elliott (University of Leeds) and Daniel Wallace (Dallas Theological Seminary) contend that they are not original to Mark’s gospel.
- Darrell Bock (Dallas Theological Seminary) responds to each view and summarizes the state of current research on the entire issue.
There are no reviews yet.