We are excited to announce that we just released the 28th Edition of the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament. The Nestle-Aland is the leading critical edition of the Greek New Testament used by scholars and seminary students all over the world. The 28th edition makes significant changes to the apparatus and uses the Editio Critica Maior as its basis for the Catholic letters (James, 1 and 2 Peter, 1-3 John, and Jude), so these letters will have textual differences from the NA27.
Here are some details from the publisher on the changes they've made in this latest edition.
Learn more about revisions to the whole edition.
Learn more about revisions to the Catholic Letters.
Accordance Edition
We have also put significant work into the Accordance edition in order to make it easier to use, navigate, and search. Check out the First Look video below to see how the NA28 looks in Accordance.
There are several purchasing options available for the NA28 depending on which version of the text you want and what you currently own.
![]() |
NA28-T with Apparatus This is the full version of the NA28 that includes the apparatus. Full Price: $109.99 Buy Now |
![]() |
GNT28-T This is the standalone text of the NA28 that does not include the apparatus or sigla marks. This text succeeds the GNT-T, which is the standalone text of the NA27. |
I assume that if we want to have both the NA27 module as well as the updated NA28 that upgrading will not overwrite the previous edition. Is that correct?
Yes, you can use both texts side by side if you own them.
I am deeply impressed with the Accordance NA28, both graphically-pedagogically and technically! Congratulations to an amazing effort!
Anders Gerdmar, ThD and Assoc Prof of New Testament Exegesis, Uppsala, Sweden
A while back, I started a series of posts on Accordance Preferences. So far, we've covered the General Settings (Part 1 and 2), the Appearance Settings, and the Workspace Settings. Now we're ready to tackle the Text Display Settings.
This is where you can set the font, size, color, style, etc. of text in all your biblical and extrabiblical Text modules. But before I focus on all the specific options in this Preferences panel, let me give you an overview of the various ways you can change the appearance of a Bible text.
Customizing the display of a single pane: Let's say you have a Search tab with two parallel panes: one containing the English Standard Version and the other containing the King James. You want to change the King James text so that it uses an Old English font. To do this, you don't need to go to the Preferences. Simply click the gear menu above the pane containing the KJV and choose Set Text Pane Display… (or use the keyboard shortcut Command-T).
This will open the Set Text Display dialog for that pane. In this dialog, you can choose from a variety of predefined themes, or you can customize a theme to look however you like. To set the text to an Old English font, click the Customize Theme button, then choose the desired font from the Font submenu under Contents.
When you click OK, your Search tab should now look like this:
By simply clicking OK to close the Text Display dialog, we are essentially telling Accordance to apply our font change to that specific text pane and that pane only. Thus, if we were to open a second pane containing the KJV, it would appear with the default font settings rather than the Old English font we chose.
Customizing the default display of a specific Text module: If you want every instance of the KJV to use the Old English font, you need to open the Set Text Pane Display dialog, make your selections, and then click Use As Default. An alert will ask you to confirm that you want to save those settings as the default for that particular Bible text. Click Save, then click OK to dismiss the Set Text Display dialog. From that point on, every time you open the KJV, it will appear in the Old English font.
Customizing the default display of several Text modules: Did you know you can select multiple Text modules in the Library and set the default display of all of them at once? Let's say you want to use the Old English font for other Bibles such as Wycliffe, Tyndale, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops' Bible. You can simply command-click each of these Text modules in your Library, then choose Set Default Display from the gear menu at the bottom of the Library panel.
When you choose Old English in the dialog and click OK, the Old English font now becomes the default for those Bibles you selected.
Customizing the default display of all Text modules: Now, what if you want to set the default display of all your Text modules in one fell swoop. That's the time to open the Preferences dialog and choose Text Display from the list of settings categories. Make changes here and click OK, and your changes will be applied to every Text module in your Library. For example, if you choose Adobe Garamond in this dialog, all your Text modules will appear in that font. That includes the King James and other older Bibles that you had previously customized to use the Old English font. Once you make a change to the Text Display settings of the Preferences dialog, any custom settings you had for specific Bibles will have to be redone.
It is therefore important that you make any global changes in the Preferences dialog before you customize the default display of individual Text modules.
In my next post, we'll look at the various display options in detail.
David,
Where did you get all of those fonts? I'm using Accordance 10.1.6, and all of those fonts beginning with the letter "o" do not appear in my list.
Joe
Joe, most of those are legacy fonts I purchased way back when I got my first Mac. There are a variety of places you can purchase additional fonts.
David,
Is there a way to view a module in Reading Mode while changing the module's preferences to appear like the night mode in iOS?
I started using Accordance to project the text onto a whiteboard in Bible class and with my lighting situation, a black background and white text is ideal. But I like how Reading Mode displays minimal interface.
Matthew, the current Reading/Search All settings of the Preferences let you set a font size for Reading Mode and choose to use the Readability theme. I imagine we could add the option to use other themes in the future, including one like the iOS Night mode. I'm afraid that's not currently possible, though.
Thanks David!
Yesterday I talked about the Search menu, which conveniently lists everything you need to fill in a blank search box. Among the options in this menu are the various Search Commands in the Enter Command submenu. Today I'd like to point out something about that submenu: its divider line.
This line divides the list of commands into two kinds, and we even have special names for them. The seven commands above the line are what we call connecting commands. The eleven commands below the line are known as stand-alone commands.
Connecting commands do exactly what the name indicates: they connect two search terms in some way, defining the relationship between them. Thus, if I use the <AND> command between the words "Moses" and "Aaron," I am looking for cases where Moses and Aaron appear together. If I use the <FOLLOWED BY> command between the two words, I am looking for cases where Moses and Aaron appear together, and where Moses comes first and Aaron second.
The connecting nature of these commands can even be seen in the angle brackets used to enclose them when they appear in the Search box. They essentially point to the terms they connect. (You see? There really is a method to our madness!)
By contrast, stand-alone commands do not connect other search terms, but stand alone as search terms in their own right. For example, the command [COUNT 1] can be entered by itself to find every word that appears only one time in the search text. Note how the stand-alone commands are enclosed in square brackets—they don't point to anything else.
As search terms in their own right, stand-alone commands can be joined with other search terms by connecting commands. For example, [COUNT 1] <AND> Moses would find any word appearing only one time, together with the word "Moses."
Understanding this simple distinction between connecting commands and stand-alone commands can help you to know when to use each type of command, and when to use them together.
As a writer, I have often known the mockery of the blank page. It glares at you, laughing at your struggles to fill it with something meaningful.
As Accordance users, we are constantly presented with a blank search box, ever ready to be put to use. Experienced users know exactly what to do with it, but new users may experience something of the mockery I feel when trying to fill a blank page. They may conceive of a search they would like to do, but how to construct it? They know Accordance is capable of much more than simple word and phrase searches, but how do they go about learning all the Boolean commands, wildcard symbols, and other tools that make such power-searching possible?
Thankfully, everything you need to fill in that blank search box—and I mean everything—is always readily available through one of the menus at the top of the screen. Can you guess which one?
As I'm sure you guessed, the aptly named Search menu presents you with everything you need to fill in the blank. Not sure what word to search for? Choose Enter Words…. Want to search a Bible with Key numbers for a particular key number? Choose Enter Key Numbers…. If your search text is a grammatically tagged Greek or Hebrew text, these menu items will appear as Enter Lexical Forms… and Enter Inflected Forms….
Beyond simply helping you enter words and key numbers, the Search menu also includes submenus listing every search command (AND, OR, NOT, etc.), every wildcard symbol, and (in the case of tagged texts) every grammatical and syntactical tag. You don't have to memorize these options or go digging through documentation even to realize they're available; just go to the Search menu and browse through the submenus. Not sure what a command or symbol does, but want to try it out? Simply select it from the menu to insert it into the search box.
By making all these options readily available, Accordance does its best to eliminate the potential mockery of the blank search box. And while there are still aspects of these commands and symbols which need to be learned, you always have them listed in a convenient place whenever you need them.
If you've never paid much attention to the Search menu, you now understand it's importance. Just remember to look there whenever you need help filling in the blank.
Please stop capitalizing every word in your post titles.
The capitalization of blog post titles is done automatically as part of the blog template, and not something I have any control over. The title of this post is actually, "Help Filling the Blank." You just can't see that! ;-)
Thanks for these, David. I am new to Accordance and learning about it every day, and it is really pulling its weight for me. But one question that so far I haven't been able to find the answer to: how do you do word counts for books of the Bible, or word counts for a section (e.g. a chapter)?
I'm sure this is very easy to do, but I can't figure it out and I haven't found the answer yet in the instructions. If there is a simple way, please let me know!
Thanks,
PT
Nevermind - I found the answer in the forums.
Monday, I wrote about a panel discussion at a recent conference which compared the use of the words βασιλεια (kingdom) and ευαγγελιον (gospel) in the Greek New Testament. To see the relevant data for myself, I did a search for βασιλεια <OR> ευαγγελιον, then chose Analysis Graph from the Stats and Graphs icon of the Search tab. I then chose to have the Analysis Graph break down this search by Lexical form (LEX).
The resulting graph plotted the frequency of these two lexical forms across the entire New Testament, and I made some observations about what it revealed. I also mentioned, in passing, that when Matthew uses the term "gospel," he is speaking of the "gospel of the kingdom."
Now, by graphing the use of each Greek lexical form separately, the Analysis Graph does not make it easy to see where the two terms are used together in a phrase like "gospel of the kingdom." So how would we see something like that?
It's in situations like this that it helps to know enough about Accordance to know when to zig and when to zag. The Analysis Graph takes whatever search you do and then breaks it down by whatever category you choose. Thus, even if we were to search for the phrase "gospel of the kingdom," the Analysis Graph will never graph the occurrences of that phrase. Instead, it will go right on graphing each occurrence of "gospel" and each occurrence of "kingdom." In short, zigging won't work in this case.
There is, however, a way to accomplish this by zagging. The Hits Graph is an older, simpler analytic tool which does one thing: plots the frequency of occurrence of the search term. Thus, if you search for a single word, it will plot the frequency of occurrence of that word. If you search for two words connected by an <OR> command, it will plot the frequency of occurrence of both those words together. If you search for a phrase, it will plot the frequency of occurrence of that phrase. You get the idea.
Now, although the Hits Graph doesn't do the kinds of comparisons that are possible with the Analysis Graph, it does include a little known feature that can come in really handy: the Keep button. In the days before the Analysis Graph, this was the only way to compare two different graphs. In the case of our comparison of βασιλεια (kingdom) and ευαγγελιον (gospel), we would have first done a search for one of those terms and then done a HITS graph. Now, because the HITS graph is dynamically linked to the search tab, it will automatically update when you do a new search—that is, unless you click the Keep button on the graph before doing the new search. Thus, we would search for βασιλεια, open a HITS graph, click the Keep button, return to the search tab and search for ευαγγελιον. The resulting HITS graph will look the same as the Analysis Graph we did the other day, showing the frequency of occurrence of each term separately.
Obviously, the Analysis Graph is easier to use than the HITS Graph for comparing two lexical forms like this, which is why few Accordance users even bother with the Keep button any more. But it still comes in handy, like when you want to compare the use of a phrase like "gospel of the kingdom" (εὐαγγέλιον τῆς βασιλείας). After doing a HITS graph of βασιλεια, clicking the Keep button, and doing a new search for ευαγγελιον, simply click the Keep button a second time, and search for εὐαγγέλιον τῆς βασιλείας. The resulting HITS Graph will look like this:
Here we can see that the three occurrences of the phrase "gospel of the kingdom" correspond exactly to the first three occurrences of the word for "gospel" in Matthew. Nowhere else is this phrase used, though Matthew frequently uses "kingdom" outside the phrase "gospel of the kingdom."
If you find yourself wanting to compare the frequency of phrases like this, the Analysis Graph won't work because it wants to break everything down into individual words, but a HITS Graph with the Keep button will let you compare each phrase you search for. In Accordance, even when zigging won't work, there's usually a way to zag.
Great series of post on comparing the frequencies. Now, it would be great to have some larger Greco-Roman literature, so as to direct the question to a comparative religions. In other words, perhaps these terms are more politically driven as aspersions against the imperial cult. Perseus, TLG, Greek Inscriptions, please!?
Thanks, David. I always look forward to your blogs, and always learn something.
Last week, I was busy exhibiting Accordance at the Gospel Coalition's National Conference here in Orlando. During a few of the sessions, I stepped away from the booth to listen to the speakers. One of these was a panel discussion entitled "Did Jesus Preach the Gospel?" In it Don Carson, Kevin DeYoung, Tim Keller, and John Piper discussed the distinction some interpreters make between the "gospel" that Paul preached and Jesus' own emphasis on the coming of the "kingdom."
It was a lively, interesting, and collegial discussion. The speakers all agreed that the Pauline epistles use the word "gospel" more frequently than the Gospels themselves, and that the Gospels use the word "kingdom" more frequently than Paul. But they disagreed with the notion that we misread the Gospels by reading them through a Pauline lens, along with the related notion that we ought instead to read Paul through the interpretive lens of Jesus' message about the coming of the kingdom. They argued that the difference in vocabulary between the Gospels and Paul does not indicate two conflicting messages, and that any attempt to give one priority over the other represented the formation of a canon within a canon. In fact, Carson pointed out that the language of "kingdom" is likewise infrequent in the Gospel of John, so this line of reasoning leads to the Synoptic Gospels becoming a "canon within a canon within a canon." He then pointed out that the belief that Matthew and Luke were dependent on Mark ends up leading to Mark becoming the "canon within a canon within a canon within a canon!"
All this made me curious about the data on which they were basing these observations, and of course, Accordance makes gathering that data a breeze. So when the session was over I returned to our booth and searched the Greek New Testament for βασιλεια <OR> ευαγγελιον. I then chose Analysis Graph from the Stats and Graphs icon of the Search tab.
The Analysis Graph shows the frequency of occurrence of various criteria across your search range. By choosing Lex (for lexical form) from the pop-up menu at the top right, I can compare the use of βασιλεια (kingdom) and ευαγγελιον (gospel) throughout the New Testament.
Looking at this graph, we see that "kingdom" is indeed far less frequent in John than in the other gospels. Yet we also see that while "kingdom" appears frequently in Luke, it is relatively infrequent in the other Lukan book of Acts.
Another interesting thing to note is how much more frequent "kingdom" is in Matthew and Luke than in Mark. It would appear from this that rather than Mark, it is the hypothetical source known as Q, which allegedly contained the sayings of Jesus common to Matthew and Luke, which would comprise the "canon within a canon within a canon within a canon" which Carson mentioned.
With respect to "gospel," it certainly does receive more attention in the Pauline corpus than anywhere else, and is almost completely absent from the General Epistles and the writings of John (for whom "kingdom" isn't a major emphasis either). Interestingly, of all the Evangelists, Mark is the one who places the greatest emphasis on "gospel." Matthew, on the other hand, is interesting because almost all of his uses of the term refer to "the gospel of the kingdom."
I will leave it to the scholars to draw meaningful conclusions from all these observations, and of course, this search might need to be supplemented with searches for other related terms. Still, I hope you can see how analytic tools like this can make it easy to spot phenomena in the Bible worth exploring.
What about you? Can you spot any interesting aspects of the above graph which I've failed to mention?
It's interesting to note the lack of either words in the Gospel of John. So I added "life" (zoe) to the search, and it produced an interesting "gap filler" in the analysis graph.
Thanks for these mini-tutorials. I am finding them very helpful in learning how to use Accordance more effectively.
I would love to hear a recording of this discussion. Does one exist?
Tom, I believe they will eventually post some kind of recording of the panel here, but nothing has been posted yet.
Another analysis graph that would be nice to see is where both words are in the same verse - like 'the gospel of the Kingdom' in Matt. 4:23.
This is the fourth in a series of posts on Accordance preferences. We've already covered the General and Appearance settings. Today, we'll look at the Workspace settings.
The first three options all have to do with the look and behavior of workspace zones. The active zone in a workspace is highlighted with a certain color. You can change this color by choosing a new one from the pop-up menu labeled Active Zone Color.
The next option lets you specify the maximum number of zones that can be opened in any given workspace. If you have a small screen, you may find that the third, fourth, or fifth zone that opens is too just too small to be useful. If you set the Default Maximum Zones pop-up to two, then Accordance can open no more than two zones in that workspace. If you open a resource that requires a third zone, Accordance will display that new zone in a separate workspace.
Now, even if you choose to set a maximum number of zones, that only prevents Accordance from opening more than that number of zones in a workspace. You are still free to drag a tab into a separate zone in order to create more zones than your default maximum.
Another option for small screens (or even those with large screens who like to save a little space) is Hide tab area if only a single tab. When you check this option, Accordance will show only a small title area for zones that only contain a single tab. As soon as a second tab is opened in that zone, the zone title area will increase in height to accommodate the two tabs.
Workspace with "Hide tab area" option unchecked
Workspace with "Hide tab area" option checked
The next three options have to do with how the Library and Instant Details panels operate. First, you can choose to have the Library always open as a popover rather than as a panel. Whenever you have a workspace that is too narrow or has too many zones to allow room for the Library to open as a panel, Accordance will automatically open the Library as a panel. If you want the Library to appear that way no matter how much room there is, simply check this option. Whatever your preference, you can always override it by holding down the shift key when you click the Library icon in the toolbar. In other words, if your default is to have the Library display as a panel, you can always force it to display as a popover by holding the shift key. If your default is to have it display as a popover, you can likewise force it to display as a panel.
Workspace with Library displayed as a panel
Workspace with Library displayed as a popover
If you would like the Library to be open whenever you create a new workspace, leave the previous option unchecked and check Add Library to new workspaces. If you would like the Instant Details to be displayed whenever you create a new workspace, check Add Instant Details to new workspaces.
The final option is to Limit window size of new workspaces. With this option checked, Accordance will open new workspaces at a specific size rather than having them fill the screen. If you have a really large monitor and you want Accordance to remain in one portion of the screen, you might want to consider this option.
Dear David:
I'm a new Accordance user, having switched over from Logos, who is throughly pleased with Accordance's design (its focus on the Holy Bible), speed (very fast in opening my modules), and capablities. Thanks for your blog which offers some insightful tips in utilizing Accordance more effectively.
Anyway, I'm really writing to make a requests for the following e-books that I find, disappointingly, to be missing from Accordance's offerings. I don't know where to pose the request or to who, so here is what I really would LIKE TO HAVE OFFERED:
Hebrew Studies:
Botterweck's “Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (FULL 15 Vols.)”;
Girdlestone's “Girdlestone Synonyms of the Old Testament”;
Holladay's “Concise Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament”;
Merwe's “Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar”;
Rosenthal's “A Grammar of Biblical Aramaic”;
Singer's The Jewish Encyclopedia (12 vols.).
Greek Studies:
Balz's “Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (3 vols.)”;
Cremer's “Biblio-Theological Lexicon of the New Testament”;
Lampe's “A Patristic Greek Lexicon”;
Moulton/Howard/Turner's “A Grammar of the New Testament (5 vols.);
Muraoka's “A Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint”;
Thackeray's “A Grammar of the Old Testament in Greek”;
Zodhiates' “The Complete Word Study Dictionary: New Testament”.
P.S. I don't understand: how come Accordance has been around since 1989 but Logos since 1992 and yet Logos offers many more modules (e-books) than Accordance? For instance: they offer all my requests (except for Botterweck, Lampe, and Muraoka) albeit Logos 5 is much SLOWERRRRRRRR than Accordance.
Sincerely, Tom.
Dear David,
thank you for all your helpful posts in this series so far. However, this time I wonder whether I missed some initial setup, since the option for "Workspaces" does not show up in my Accordance settings at all:
Greetings
Daniel
Daniel, the preferences have been reorganized recently, and the Workspace settings now contain options which were previously found elsewhere, along with a few new options. If you are using Accordance 10 and you update to the latest version (10.1.5), you'll see the Workspace settings. If you're on an older version of Accordance, you'll likely find some of these options under General or Appearance.
Tom, the best place to make these kinds of requests is on our forums. That way, other users can chime in and give us a sense of how much demand there is for these resources.
As for the history of Accordance, Accordance was first released in 1994, not 1989. OakTree Software released The Perfect Word in 1989, which eventually was purchased by Zondervan and rebranded as MacBible, so we essentially started over with Accordance.
When it comes to why some resources are available and others not, each developer sets priorities differently, has varying degrees of success establishing relationships with specific publishers, is willing to accept terms the others may not be willing to accept, etc. While Accordance may lack resources other developers offer, we also offer many resources those developers lack, and we're adding more all the time.
Hope this helps.
For as long as I have been using Accordance, I still get impressed with its customization options and lattitude of flexibility offered to the user!
When I was in college, I decided to take Greek and Hebrew at the same time. The Classics department didn't offer Biblical Greek, so I had to take Classical Greek with its dizzying array of paradigms and its wild-and-wooly approach to word order. By comparison, Biblical Hebrew was a breeze: there were only three "tenses," a relatively small vocabulary, and a relatively simple sentence structure (at least at first!). I left college with the firm conviction that Greek is a more difficult language than Hebrew.
Then I went to seminary, where I took Greek and Hebrew again. There I was surprised to find that to a man (and woman), my fellow seminarians firmly regarded Greek as the easier of the two languages. I thought they were all crazy, until I began to see the differences between their initial experience of Greek and my own. They were learning Biblical Greek, with its much simpler (and often much like English) sentence structure. The vocabulary was limited to words in the New Testament, and many of these words were already familiar to those who grew up hearing them in sermons and Bible studies. Finally, there was the motivation factor: if they learned Greek, they would be able to speak with the same authority as their pastor or favorite theologian. But how many pastors and theologians had they heard spit out words like chesed and chaim?
For these seminarians, Greek was at least somewhat familiar, while Hebrew was entirely foreign: read from right-to-left, with strange consonants and even stranger vowels, some of which represented unusual sounds. Even the grammatical terminology was different, with binyanim, "aspect," and "construct state" instead of tense, voice, mood, and case. Thus, they saw it as self-evident that Hebrew is harder to learn than Greek.
I'm here to tell you it's not. Hebrew is a fun language to learn and a relatively simple one to get started learning. If you can get past its apparent foreignness, you're well on your way.
That's one of the things I like about The First Hebrew Primer by EKS Publishing. Billed as “The adult beginner’s path to learning Biblical Hebrew, this grammar takes the time to help you get past the apparent foreignness of the language. For example, most Hebrew grammars will cover the consonants in one chapter and the vowels in a second, presenting you with a chart to memorize and lots of facts about which letters are silent, what a dagesh is and how it affects the pronunciation of some letters, etc. The student then has to absorb all this information just to get started. The First Hebrew Primer takes a different approach, teaching a handful of consonants and vowels together and then showing how you could use them to write simple English words like "Bob" and "odd." The Accordance module also incorporates the "audio companion" to the grammar, which you can play to hear how all of the Hebrew is pronounced. If you're trying to learn Hebrew outside a classroom setting, that help is invaluable.
Another thing I personally like about The First Hebrew Primer is that it teaches the script or cursive form of Hebrew in addition to the block letters you typically see in print.
I learned to write in script in college, and found it made writing Hebrew much quicker than trying to use block letters. That in turn, made doing the exercises much less painful. Over the years, I've forgotten many of the script letters, and when I was in Israel a few years ago I found myself struggling to make out the street signs and graffiti that were written that way. I'm personally glad to now have a refresher in script, and would recommend you take the time to learn it before you do too many of the exercises.
Beyond the alphabet, The First Hebrew Primer introduces just enough of certain concepts to get you reading Hebrew as quickly as possible. By chapter four, you're already reading simple sentences in Hebrew. The exercises in the Primer help you to put the concepts you've learned into practice, and the answer key at the back will help you to gauge your progress.
If you've ever wanted to teach yourself Hebrew, I strongly recommend you try The First Hebrew Primer. If you do, I think you'll come to agree with me that learning Hebrew is much easier than it looks. You can then wink at those Greek-biased seminarians and say, "Aw, what are you complaining about? Hebrew ain't hard!"
The First Hebrew Primer, which includes the text, the answer book, and the audio companion is normally $79.99, but is now on sale for just $64.99. Don't wait, though. The sale ends April 15, 2013.
David,
Thanks for this; it is so true and so helpful. I do hope that lots of users who are considering learning Hebrew see it. I know very little Hebrew but the little I know l learnt from this book. I had recommneded several times on the Forums but with no response. That could be for many reasons! But I felt a little embarrassed that I was recomending such a 'simple' book which might be somewhat frowned upon by the real scholars! I am delighted to see that there is now an Accordance version and that you are highly recommending it. Thanks again,
Kevin.
This is the third in a series of posts on Accordance preferences. We've already covered the General settings here and here. Today, we'll look at the Appearance settings.
The Appearance preferences present you with a number of broad ways you can change the look of Accordance. While this is not the place to go to change the font used in your various texts and tools (click Text Display or Tool Display for that), Appearance is the place to go when you want to make more fundamental changes, such as the maximum width of a line of text or how quickly to auto-scroll.
The options under Text Appearance let you make some interesting typographic changes. The first of these lets you specify the maximum width of text in a window. For example, if you have a wide screen and a workspace with only one tab, you may end up with a very wide column of text.
Since this can be hard to read, you may want to specify that a column of text can be only six inches wide. To do that check Limit text width and then drag the slider to six inches. When you click OK, even the widest window will show a column of text no wider than six inches. Any additional space will appear as white space to the left and right of the text.
The next text display option is to use ligatures in fonts that support it. Ligatures are combinations of letters that share common elements, such as fl and fi. The following screen shots show the same text with the use ligatures option unchecked and checked:
Without ligatures
With ligatures
Remember that ligatures are only supported in certain fonts, so you won't see a difference with older, legacy fonts.
Another text appearance option is to use European verse notation. With this option checked, Accordance will display verse references according to European conventions. It will also interpret verse references in searches accordingly.
A similar option is to have Accordance use SBL standard abbreviations for Bible book names. Check this option, and Accordance will display book names using SBL abbreviations.
In addition to the Text Appearance options just mentioned, Accordance offers a few Other appearance options. Here you can set the font size of text in Browser panes such as the Library and the Tool window's Table of Contents. You can also adjust the speed of auto-scrolling, choose to use a white background for pictures instead of the default black, and turn on or off the automatic widening of the Tool window's Table of Contents browser when you mouse over it.
I had no idea about the automatic widening of the Table of Contents browser, even though I've been using Accordance nearly every day for 8 months. Thanks for pointing that (and the other things) out!
This is the second in a series of posts on Accordance preferences. Yesterday we covered some of the General settings. Today, we'll cover the rest of them.
In addition to letting you choose how you want Accordance to start up and what information dialogs you want to have displayed, the General settings let you tweak Accordance's amplify behavior.
When you select a word or verse reference in Accordance, you can then choose to search for that selected text in any Accordance resource. This is the process we call amplifying. For example, let's say you select the Greek word λόγος in John 1:1, then choose BDAG from the Amplify menu on the Toolbar. A new tab containing BDAG will automatically be opened to the entry on λόγος.
There's something else to notice about this search: in addition to searching for the selected word in the Greek Entry field, Accordance has also searched the Scripture field for John 1:1. This makes it easy to click the down Mark button to find where John 1:1 is cited in this long article.
Doing a search for both the selected word and the verse in which it appears can also help to distinguish among homographs: words that are spelled the same but mean different things.
This two-pronged searching when you amplify is almost always a good thing, especially since Accordance will still find the selected word even if the current verse is not cited. Still, there are some users who just want to search for the selected word without also including the verse reference. Consequently, the General preferences has a checkbox labeled Include reference when amplifying from text to tool. Uncheck that box, and Accordance will only search for the selected word without including the verse reference.
Another Amplify setting you can choose is Require selection for amplifying. If this box is checked, you must drag or double-click to select a word or verse reference before amplifying. If this box is unchecked, you can simply click in a word or verse reference so that the cursor is blinking inside it, and Accordance will regard that as a valid selection. Thus, you could simply click inside the word λόγος in John 1:1 to select it. Many users like this convenience: you can simply click to select something and then amplify. However, others find it too easy to click something and select it without meaning to. If you're in the latter camp, check this box to make sure you must do more than just click to select something.
The last Amplify option in the General preferences is Confine amplify to the same workspace. If you find yourself opening more than one workspace at a time, you may want to consider this option. Let's say I have one workspace for New Testament studies, and I amplify a word in the Greek New Testament to look it up in a Greek lexicon. In another workspace, I have the Greek Septuagint text, and I decide to amplify one of those words to look it up in that same Greek lexicon. Because I already have a copy of that lexicon open in the New Testament workspace, Accordance will look up my Septuagint word there, in my NT Studies Workspace.
If, however, I have Confine amplify to the same workspace checked, Accordance will open a second copy of my lexicon in the same workspace as my Septuagint text. That way, each workspace will have its own copy of my lexicon that will only be used when I amplify from a word in that workspace.
The last section of the General settings offers two more general options. When drag and drop text editing was first introduced, some long-time Mac users found it disconcerting, so we allow you to disable it. Also, the default behavior of the Accordance Slide Show mode is to advance to the next slide when the mouse is clicked. If you don't want mouse clicks to advance slides, you can specify that they be ignored.
That's it for the General preferences. Next we'll look at the Appearance settings.
What is "drag and drop text editing"?
By that we mean the ability to select text and then drag that selected text and drop it somewhere else. Try selecting a phrase and then dragging it into the search entry box at the top of a search tab. Checking the suppress option would make it impossible to drag that selection of text.
Comments in this Category
All Comments